Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Feb 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Kempton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clive Kempton

  • Postcode verified

    TN40 2LU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+75Very positivemore positive than 75% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexemplaryexceptionalsafeexceptionallyrapid progressvery wellhigh-quality
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings495w+68
  • Leadership172w+74
  • What needs to improve65w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
716
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 23%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Whiteman Headteacher St Mary’s Wrestwood Children’s Trust Wrestwood Road Bexhill-on-Sea East Sussex TN40 2LU

p.1

social, health and economic (PSHE) education

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 9 February 2010 to look at work in PSHE education.

p.1

social, health and economic (PSHE) education

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of PSHE education, the visit had a particular focus on learning to stay safe.

p.1

social, health and economic (PSHE) education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

social, health and economic (PSHE) education

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff including therapists, subject coordinators, residential staff, a parent governor, and the school social worker; scrutiny of relevant documentation; observation of two lessons; discussion and lunch with pupils; and observation of an assembly.

p.1

social, health and economic (PSHE) education

The overall effectiveness of PSHE education is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in PSHE education

Achievement in PSHE education is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in PSHE education

 Pupils have impressive personal and social skills. They make rapid progress as they move through the school and are polite, courteous and keen to talk to visitors with pride about their school. They are able to recognise their personal strengths and weaknesses.  Throughout the day, staff model and reinforce good social interaction and behaviour. Mealtimes are particularly good examples of how pupils use this learned behaviour, displaying exemplary table manners, some using adapted cutlery.  Pupils evidently develop confidence and self-esteem as they get older. They become increasingly independent in the school, within the local community, and in their ability to plan, shop and cook meals for themselves and friends.  Pupils have an appropriate knowledge of sex and relationships and drugs education, taking account of their wide range of needs.

p.1

Quality of teaching of PSHE education

The quality of teaching of PSHE education is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching of PSHE education

 Lessons are always practical, enjoyable and meaningful to pupils’ lives.  Therapists and staff work together to ensure that the specific needs of individuals are met. Learning is consolidated in both the day and the residential curriculum.  Assessment is a strength of the teaching and ongoing in all settings. It is used well by all staff to monitor individual progress and to set new and individual targets.  Learning objectives in teachers’ lesson plans are not always sharp enough.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in PSHE education

 The PSHE curriculum is rich and permeates all aspects of the school, both during the day and across the residential curriculum.  Pupils have a wide range of opportunities to develop their personal and social skills through an exceptional range of after-school, evening and weekend clubs, trips and local visits.  The school’s focus on developing speech, language, communication and independent travel has a profound impact on pupils’ development.  The PSHE schemes of work are planned carefully to ensure progression and independence as pupils move through the school.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in PSHE education

The leadership and management of PSHE education are outstanding.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in PSHE education

 PSHE education has a high profile in the school and is supported very well by senior leaders.  The PSHE provision is planned, monitored and assessed exceptionally well to ensure that all pupils are appropriately supported by staff, a wide range of therapists, facilitators and other outside professionals.  High-quality professional development training for identified staff is regularly evaluated and disseminated to all staff. All staff are supported well to deliver the PSHE curriculum.

p.2

Subject issue: learning to stay safe

Great care is taken by all staff to ensure that pupils learn how to stay safe. An outstanding example is their growing awareness of how to travel independently. A carefully structured programme ensures that learning how to stay safe is high profile for all pupils. For example, using a telephone, stranger danger, keeping passwords safe on the computer and showing respect for themselves and each other to prevent bullying. Pupils report feeling safe in the school and know that any concern will be listened to and acted on.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that all PSHE lessons have clear and measurable learning objectives.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop PSHE education in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion