Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Mar 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony Green

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony Green

  • Postcode verified

    NN6 0AG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentgood progressmake good progresseagereffectivelyclearlyimproving
Criticismnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings582w+79
  • Leadership168w+75
  • What needs to improve108w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
835
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 20%What needs to improve 13%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs P Hulse Overstone Primary School Sywell Road Overstone Northampton Northamptonshire NN6 0AG

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 12 February 2010 to look at work in ICT.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the use of ICT to support learning in other subjects.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with you, your ICT coordinator, Year 2 and Year 6 pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of a Year 2 and a Year 6 lesson; and a tour of the school, with a focus on ICT, given by two Year 6 pupils.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT is good.

p.1

Achievement in ICT

 Although attainment on entry differs from year to year, pupils generally enter school with ICT capabilities that are in line with expectations. They make good progress and, by Year 6, attainment is above expectations.  Attitudes and behaviour are outstanding. Pupils are eager to do well and support each other to overcome difficulties and new challenges.  As a result of ongoing work on cyber-bullying and e-safety, by Year 6, pupils have an excellent understanding of the need to work safely and appropriately when using new technologies.  Pupils have a good understanding of how ICT supports their work in other subjects of the curriculum.

p.1

Quality of teaching in ICT

The quality of teaching in ICT is good. However, outstanding teaching was also observed.

p.2

Quality of teaching in ICT

 Good teaching results in pupils making good progress in lessons and over time.  The subject knowledge of teachers and teaching assistants is good.  Questions are used effectively in lessons to assess and develop pupils’ understanding of the tasks and/or the skills being learnt.  Lessons are planned well because of good use of assessment. This results in different groups of pupils making similarly good progress, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities and gifted and talented pupils.  The teaching of pupils by age, rather than in mixed-age groups, is having a beneficial effect on the attainment and achievement of pupils.  The impact of ICT, when linked to other subjects, is beginning to be assessed, since September 2009, through the trialling of a local authority electronic tracking and assessment program.  Portfolios and monitoring of groups of pupils are giving a good indication

p.2

Quality of teaching in ICT

of who exceeds, meets or is not achieving in aspects of ICT.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

The quality of the curriculum in ICT is good

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in ICT

 All aspects of the statutory National Curriculum for ICT are covered because of the use of a thoroughly planned curriculum produced by the local authority. As you introduce the ‘creative curriculum’, you are beginning to adapt your scheme of work from the local authority guidance.  You recognise that before this academic year, the planned use of control and use of sensors have not been as effective as in other aspects of the ICT curriculum. You have relied on well-established visits to a local secondary school to ensure these strands are covered. This has now been tackled following the purchase of relevant resources.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT

The effectiveness of the leadership and management in ICT are good.  Leadership and management of ICT are having a good impact on the development of the subject.  Regular training is continuing to improve the skills and knowledge of staff.  The ICT development plan is clearly focused on improving the provision for ICT and on raising attainment and achievement.  The ICT leader is an excellent role-model for the teaching of the subject and has regular opportunities to teach other classes.

p.2

Subject issue: the use of ICT to support learning in other subjects

The use of ICT to support learning in other subjects is good.

p.3

Subject issue: the use of ICT to support learning in other subjects

 ICT is having a good impact on raising standards in other subjects. It also provides outstanding support to pupils’ personal and spiritual development and their social skills.  Since September 2009, you have started to assess the use and impact of ICT in other subjects.  Pupils have a great deal of pride in their work. They recognise that the use of ICT in other subjects makes them more interesting and relevant.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 embedding the analysis and monitoring of the impact of ICT when used across the curriculum  embedding the cross-curricular links between subjects and ICT, as the school continues to develop the ‘creative curriculum’  embedding the planned use of recourses for control technology and sensors, rather than relying on visits to the local secondary school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion