Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Helen Barter
- Postcode verified
SO14 5FB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Through rigorous monitoring, the headteacher has a very clear understanding of how well teachers use information about students’ progress to plan effective lessons. p.4
- On the whole, students respond well to the staff’s high expectations of behaviour. p.3
- More satisfactory and good lessons are being delivered at both centres, and outstanding teaching in English was observed at The Melbourne Centre. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment28
“A small proportion of teaching remains inadequate at both centres.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,845
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs J Smith Headteacher Southampton PRU The Melbourne Centre 18 Melbourne Street Chapel Southampton Hampshire SO14 5FB
p.1
unit (PRU) The Melbourne Centre
Following my visit to your school on 9 and 10 February 2010, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.
p.1
unit (PRU) The Melbourne Centre
The visit was the third monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in March 2009. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.
p.1
unit (PRU) The Melbourne Centre
Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory
p.1
unit (PRU) The Melbourne Centre
Progress since previous monitoring inspection – satisfactory
p.1
unit (PRU) The Melbourne Centre
Newly qualified teachers may not be appointed.
p.1
unit (PRU) The Melbourne Centre
This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.1
unit (PRU) The Melbourne Centre
I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the chair of the management committee and the Executive Director for Children’s Services and Learning for Southampton City Council.
p.1
Additional Inspector
Tribal Education1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0845 6404045 Ofstedhelpline@ofsted.gov.uk Page 2
p.1
Evidence
The inspector observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the headteacher, the heads of The Melbourne Centre and the Compass Centre, the special educational needs coordinator, the education welfare officer, a representative of the management committee and a representative from the local authority. Informal conversations were held with students at each site.
p.2
Context
The former executive headteacher is now appointed as the special educational needs coordinator and works three days a week across both centres. The home−school liaison officer is now appointed permanently and works three days a week at The Melbourne Centre. A new chair of the management committee has been appointed. Attendance Officers have been appointed at both centres. The head of the Compass Centre will retire in July 2010. Interviews to appoint a deputy headteacher for the Compass Centre, who will work alongside the head of the centre from Easter, took place during the week of this visit.
p.2
Students’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
The school continues to develop its systems to monitor students’ achievements. As some problems remain in getting detailed information about students’ prior learning, the school is rightly introducing its own systems at both centres to test students’ academic and personal starting points in order to set challenging targets for their achievement.
p.2
Students’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
At The Melbourne Centre, the system for tracking students’ progress is beginning to show a picture of individual progress in English, mathematics and science. While senior staff recognise that there are inaccuracies in some of the assessments, the system is becoming a useful management tool for discussing students’ progress with teachers, parents and carers and, importantly, the students themselves. The newness of this system means that the full impact in improving students’ achievement is not yet evident. The school’s data show that, while some students make satisfactory progress and are on track to gain their predicted GCSE grades, others do not progress quickly enough to reach their targets. The school is aware of the work it needs to do, along with other agencies, to support those students who are not on course to take up education, employment or training at the end of this academic year.
p.2
Students’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
The local authority has given good support in helping staff at the Compass Centre to devise a new range of assessments which will more appropriately measure students’ Page 3 starting points, particularly in terms of their behaviour and personal development. The school recognises that, through these new systems, teachers must use the information effectively to plan lessons which match students’ needs and set targets to raise all students’ academic and personal achievement. The centre is about to introduce individual ‘learning journeys’ for students with the aim of helping them to better understand their own progress and the steps they need to take to further improve. The effectiveness of this will be evaluated at the next visit.
p.2
Students’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
Progress since the last visit on the areas for improvement:
p.3
Students’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning
Raise achievement by setting challenging targets for students in all years, based on accurate assessment of their attainment on entry – satisfactory
p.3
Other relevant pupil outcomes
On the whole, students respond well to the staff’s high expectations of behaviour. Any incidents are quickly defused because staff at both centres use behaviour management techniques consistently and calmly. Students continue to take opportunities to smoke at The Melbourne Centre but there are suitable plans in place to run anti-smoking programmes next term.
p.3
Other relevant pupil outcomes
Students’ continuing low attendance at both centres is at the forefront of the school’s concerns. There is full recognition of the barrier that this presents to improving students’ achievement. There are some positive ‘green shoots’ in individual attendance and, at The Melbourne Centre, the number of students achieving 75% attendance or more is increasing. The attendance of permanently excluded students at the Compass Centre remains a particular worry. The school knows that work needs to be done with these students to set expectations for attendance, particularly for those transferring to The Melbourne Centre.
p.3
Other relevant pupil outcomes
The school and local authority are making concerted efforts to use all the available expertise and support available to improve attendance although there has not been time for these improvements to have significantly raised attendance levels. The new attendance sub-group of the task group has rigorously audited the current strategies to improve attendance and has a clear action plan in place against which to monitor their effectiveness. The education welfare officer and home−school liaison officer continue to play key roles in their work with individual students, parents and carers. The newly appointed attendance officers, through early morning calls, are giving clear messages to students, parents and carers that attendance and good punctuality are expected. The role of tutors in encouraging and accounting for students’ attendance is now much clearer. Teachers are expected to account for attendance in each individual lesson, although not all are rigorous enough in doing
p.3
Other relevant pupil outcomes
so. The best lesson attendance occurs in English at The Melbourne Centre because there are very high expectations to which students respond well. Page 4 Progress since the last visit on the areas for improvement:
p.3
Other relevant pupil outcomes
Extend the range of strategies to improve students’ attendance and reduce the high number of persistent absentees – satisfactory
p.4
The effectiveness of provision
As a result of the new lesson planning format, teachers’ planning is more focused on matching activities to students’ abilities and aspirations. Through rigorous monitoring, the headteacher has a very clear understanding of how well teachers use information about students’ progress to plan effective lessons. More satisfactory and good lessons are being delivered at both centres, and outstanding teaching in English was observed at The Melbourne Centre. In both centres, teachers have good subject knowledge and engage in meaningful dialogue with students as a result. Progress reviews with students at The Melbourne Centre rightly give students an honest evaluation of the levels at which they are working. From discussions with them, students clearly know their target grades. A small proportion of teaching remains inadequate at both centres. This is because planning is still too focused on the delivery of content rather than on students’ academic needs and how these will
p.4
The effectiveness of provision
be met. This means that teachers cannot be sure that all students make the progress of which they are capable. Recent training for teaching assistants focused on their role in supporting learning. While most fulfil this role, there are some occasions when teaching assistants offer too much support to students rather than allowing them time to think and learn independently.
p.4
The effectiveness of provision
Students are gradually becoming accustomed to the curriculum at The Melbourne Centre although Year 11 students’ engagement with it is still not as good as that of the Year 10 students. Students continue to gain the greatest enjoyment from practical subjects, outdoor pursuits and sporting activities.
p.4
The effectiveness of provision
Students at the Compass Centre now receive their correct entitlement to 24 hours of taught time per week. As well as ensuring the correct amount of time, a great deal of work and thought by the headteacher and staff have gone into remodelling the curriculum so that the time is planned purposefully for teaching and learning throughout the day. The ‘Journey Through Compass’ curriculum was less than a week old at the time of this visit and students and staff are not yet fully accustomed to this significant change. It is therefore not possible to evaluate its impact in terms of improving students’ achievement.
p.4
The effectiveness of provision
Progress since the last visit on the areas for improvement:
p.4
The effectiveness of provision
Ensure that all students have the recommended full-time provision – satisfactory Page 5
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
The effectiveness of leadership and management is rapidly gathering pace. The headteacher is influential in her role and is working very effectively with the local authority to make the required changes and improvements. Some of these changes have been achieved quite quickly, such as ensuring that safeguarding meets statutory requirements and introducing new curricula at both centres. Others, such as the use of assessment in teaching and learning and the strategies to improve attendance, are taking longer but are starting to make a difference. The headteacher has an honest and realistic view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses through the monitoring and evaluation systems which are proving to be rigorous and robust. There is a very clear vision about the developing strategic role of other senior leaders across the two centres while carefully building on the strengths and expertise which already exist.
p.5
The effectiveness of leadership and management
The wealth of expertise and experience on the management committee contributes to the effectiveness of leadership and management. Regular meetings are firmly focused on monitoring the effectiveness of actions taken to improve provision and the impact these have on raising achievement. Minutes of meetings show that members are not afraid to ask challenging questions of the headteacher in their pursuit to drive forward improvements. While there are still some gaps in data, increasing analysis of information which is available is helping the school to set itself challenging targets for the future. The school recognises that it must use data about students’ performance with increasing precision so that teaching and learning are fully effective in raising students’ achievement.
p.5
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Progress since the last visit on the areas for improvement:
p.5
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Strengthen the capacity to improve by appointing permanent staff in key leadership and management positions – satisfactory Collect and rigorously analyse data to evaluate the school’s performance – satisfactory
p.5
External support
The school is benefiting from good quality support and advice from the local authority. It has been very proactive in ensuring safeguarding requirements are met and funding building improvements to remedy identified health and safety concerns. The coaching support for teaching and learning is much appreciated by staff and its impact is starting to be shown through the improved quality of lesson planning. The inspector for special educational needs gives highly valuable advice and has been particularly helpful in setting up new assessments at the Compass Centre. A further unannounced inspection by the local authority has helped the headteacher to build a picture of the quality of teaching and learning across the two centres and matches the headteacher’s own evaluation of teaching quality. The school’s drive to improve Page 6 the strategic role of centre leaders has been well supported by the local authority in
p.5
External support
its agreement to fund a new deputy headteacher post from Easter.
p.6
Priorities for further improvement
Rigorously implement the strategies in place for improving attendance and monitor closely their effectiveness. Embed the systems for assessing students’ attainment on entry and tracking their progress in order to inform accurate planning of lessons and thereby raise students’ achievement.
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion