Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anne Wellham

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anne Wellham

  • Postcode verified

    BN1 8BP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentimprovedwell-plannedimprovingeffectiveeffectivelysuccessfullypositive
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings558w+80
  • What needs to improve92w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
642
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 22, typical 45
Average sentence
25 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms P Sargent The Headteacher Patcham High School Ladies Mile Road Brighton BN1 8BP

p.1

and achievement: the power of partnership

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 2 and 3 December 2009 to look at your partnership with higher education.

p.1

and achievement: the power of partnership

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and achievement: the power of partnership

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: discussions with senior leaders and staff; scrutiny of documentation; visits to lessons; and meetings with students, parents, university undergraduates, representatives of Brighton University and Aimhigher.

p.1

Features of good practice

 The school is outward-looking, proactive and innovative in establishing and developing partnerships with higher-education providers. An impressive range of projects using the university’s facilities and resources has increased students’ learning and improved their motivation and self- esteem.  Partnerships arising from the school’s specialist arts and media status have made a significant contribution to improving the achievement and well- being of students. Excellent community and outreach work with local primary schools and adult-learning sessions are managed by the community arts coordinator to promote cohesion and increase access to learning in the wider community. The role of the community arts coordinator has the potential to contribute to the strategic development of community work and its impact across the school.  The role of the non-teaching learning and teaching coach/professional tutor has had a significant impact on improving the quality of teaching and

p.1

Features of good practice

learning. Effective partnerships with higher-education providers of initial teacher training have improved:  the subject knowledge and pedagogy of teachers, particularly in art, media, English and modern foreign languages departments  the capacity of leadership and the professional development of middle managers and teachers across the school  the engagement of students in well-planned and interactive lessons that use assessment to promote learning.

p.2

Features of good practice

 The school has enhanced the curriculum very effectively by using the expertise offered by local universities. Excellent examples include:  the use of specialist media facilities for filming and editing student-led projects  a popular trip to Germany accompanied by university staff and undergraduates  a writing project for Year 6 and 7 pupils and their parents to inspire creative writing.

p.2

Features of good practice

 The school works successfully with Aimhigher to provide challenging opportunities for targeted students who have the potential to enter higher and further education. Opportunities to take part in national competitions, residential summer schools and to interact with undergraduate student- ambassadors present students with a broader view of the world and a chance to talk to positive and inspiring role-models. In discussion, students said how much they value and enjoy these experiences and recognise the considerable improvements to their motivation, confidence and self-esteem.  The school has been very successful in raising the aspirations of students and increasing the number of students progressing to further education. There are productive links at subject level with local colleges in art, modern foreign languages and media. However, the school receives limited information on the progress and well-being of students from the

p.2

Features of good practice

colleges and only has a partial picture of whether past students’ aspirations of entering higher education have been realised.

p.2

Areas for development

 Formalise curriculum links with local colleges and establish procedures to receive information on the progress and well-being of students who enter further education, especially those that have been identified as having the potential to progress to higher education.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop partnerships to support school improvement. As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion