Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Paul Armitage
- Postcode verified
SL1 3BW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There is a strong emphasis on students’ self-assessment which is effective in helping their progress. p.2
- Its principal strength and guiding rationale is the strong emphasis on chronology in Key Stage 3. p.2
- Students affirm consistently that teachers are supportive and want them to do well. p.2
- Students make outstanding progress in both Key Stages 3 and 4. p.1
- Teaching is well-planned; objectives are clear and teachers have very good professional relationships with students. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance2
“The effectiveness of leadership and management is good.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 716
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs A Cameron Headteacher Herschel Grammar School Northampton Avenue Slough Berkshire SL1 3BW
p.1
Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: history
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 19 and 20 November 2009 to look at work in history.
p.1
Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: history
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the contribution of history to community cohesion and the development of independent learning in history.
p.1
Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: history
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.
p.1
Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: history
The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff and students, a scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and the observation of three lessons.
p.1
Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: history
The overall effectiveness of history is good.
p.1
Achievement in history
Attainment in Key Stage 3 and in GCSE is above average. Attainment at A and AS level is also above average with a bias towards grades B and C. Students make outstanding progress in both Key Stages 3 and 4. In the sixth form, progress is good. To improve it further, the department has introduced new measures, such as more frequent knowledge testing, more detailed monitoring and better use of this information to improve teaching. One example of these changes, seen on inspection, was a Year 13 lesson focusing on peer-evaluation of essays linked to target grades. Students’ personal development is good. Their increasing mastery of the subject is reflected in improved self-confidence. The impact of the study topics, such as the history of the civil rights movement, is seen in increased understanding of politics and the human condition.
p.1
Quality of teaching in history
Teaching is well-planned; objectives are clear and teachers have very good professional relationships with students. Students affirm consistently that teachers are supportive and want them to do well. They appreciate the good range of activities provided in lessons. Assessment is regular and the information very well used to inform both teachers and students. There is a strong emphasis on students’ self-assessment which is effective in helping their progress. The quality of marking is good. Good use is made of resources which include laptops for research.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in history
Its principal strength and guiding rationale is the strong emphasis on chronology in Key Stage 3. Due weight is given to significant topics, such as the First World War, and these are suitably adapted to reflect the multicultural nature of the school. Links with outside agencies are also exploited to ensure the curriculum meets the needs and interests of students. One of these agencies, Creative Partnerships, provides a playwright to explore, with students, the history of local immigrants. Students react well to such initiatives, enjoy learning and progress well as a result. Building on this, the department acknowledges that it can do more to address students’ needs. There is a good programme of visits including, for example, Year 9’s visit to the battlefields in Belgium.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management in history
The effectiveness of leadership and management is good.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management in history
The head of department has an excellent understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of provision in history. The quality of the department’s self-evaluation document is outstanding. As a result, there are effective strategies in place not only to maintain the high standards but also to improve them where necessary. A particularly significant feature is the way in which the three members of staff work closely together thus ensuring that improvements are applied universally. The department benefits from significant support from senior management in the school which values history and the insights it gives to young people.
p.2
Subject issue: the contribution of history to community cohesion
The contribution of history to community cohesion is good.
p.2
Subject issue: the contribution of history to community cohesion
History provides good opportunities for students from a range of backgrounds to work closely together and, as a result, plays a significant role in maintaining relations between different groups. In addition, monitoring of the performance of different groups of students ensures that they get the help they need and reflects the school’s commitment to promoting equality of opportunity. The Creative Partnerships initiative also helps bring together students from different backgrounds.
p.2
Subject issue: the development of independent learning in history
The development of independent learning in history is good.
p.3
Subject issue: the development of independent learning in history
Students have lots of opportunities to use their initiative. For example, they are encouraged to prepare presentations on selected topics. Homework is used for activities such as computer-based research and, in Year 7, the construction of Norman castles. The department has strategies in place to ensure that students are given even more opportunities to ask their own questions, research answers and communicate these in different ways.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
developing further, ways of ensuring that the Key Stage 3 curriculum tackles topics that students need to know and understand in preparation for adult life.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion