Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Armitage

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Armitage

  • Postcode verified

    SL1 3BW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+92Very positivemore positive than 94% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstrongexcellentvery welleffectivewell-plannedimprovedconsistently
Criticismweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings382w+89
  • Leadership263w+73
  • What needs to improve81w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
716
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Leadership 30%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs A Cameron Headteacher Herschel Grammar School Northampton Avenue Slough Berkshire SL1 3BW

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: history

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 19 and 20 November 2009 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: history

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the contribution of history to community cohesion and the development of independent learning in history.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: history

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff and students, a scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and the observation of three lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: history

The overall effectiveness of history is good.

p.1

Achievement in history

 Attainment in Key Stage 3 and in GCSE is above average. Attainment at A and AS level is also above average with a bias towards grades B and C. Students make outstanding progress in both Key Stages 3 and 4. In the sixth form, progress is good. To improve it further, the department has introduced new measures, such as more frequent knowledge testing, more detailed monitoring and better use of this information to improve teaching. One example of these changes, seen on inspection, was a Year 13 lesson focusing on peer-evaluation of essays linked to target grades.  Students’ personal development is good. Their increasing mastery of the subject is reflected in improved self-confidence. The impact of the study topics, such as the history of the civil rights movement, is seen in increased understanding of politics and the human condition.

p.1

Quality of teaching in history

 Teaching is well-planned; objectives are clear and teachers have very good professional relationships with students. Students affirm consistently that teachers are supportive and want them to do well. They appreciate the good range of activities provided in lessons. Assessment is regular and the information very well used to inform both teachers and students. There is a strong emphasis on students’ self-assessment which is effective in helping their progress. The quality of marking is good. Good use is made of resources which include laptops for research.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

 Its principal strength and guiding rationale is the strong emphasis on chronology in Key Stage 3. Due weight is given to significant topics, such as the First World War, and these are suitably adapted to reflect the multicultural nature of the school. Links with outside agencies are also exploited to ensure the curriculum meets the needs and interests of students. One of these agencies, Creative Partnerships, provides a playwright to explore, with students, the history of local immigrants. Students react well to such initiatives, enjoy learning and progress well as a result. Building on this, the department acknowledges that it can do more to address students’ needs. There is a good programme of visits including, for example, Year 9’s visit to the battlefields in Belgium.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

The effectiveness of leadership and management is good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

 The head of department has an excellent understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of provision in history. The quality of the department’s self-evaluation document is outstanding. As a result, there are effective strategies in place not only to maintain the high standards but also to improve them where necessary. A particularly significant feature is the way in which the three members of staff work closely together thus ensuring that improvements are applied universally. The department benefits from significant support from senior management in the school which values history and the insights it gives to young people.

p.2

Subject issue: the contribution of history to community cohesion

The contribution of history to community cohesion is good.

p.2

Subject issue: the contribution of history to community cohesion

 History provides good opportunities for students from a range of backgrounds to work closely together and, as a result, plays a significant role in maintaining relations between different groups. In addition, monitoring of the performance of different groups of students ensures that they get the help they need and reflects the school’s commitment to promoting equality of opportunity. The Creative Partnerships initiative also helps bring together students from different backgrounds.

p.2

Subject issue: the development of independent learning in history

The development of independent learning in history is good.

p.3

Subject issue: the development of independent learning in history

 Students have lots of opportunities to use their initiative. For example, they are encouraged to prepare presentations on selected topics.  Homework is used for activities such as computer-based research and, in Year 7, the construction of Norman castles.  The department has strategies in place to ensure that students are given even more opportunities to ask their own questions, research answers and communicate these in different ways.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 developing further, ways of ensuring that the Key Stage 3 curriculum tackles topics that students need to know and understand in preparation for adult life.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion