Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kevin Culver

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kevin Culver

  • Postcode verified

    SA7 0AJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+91Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveexcellentoutstandingvery well

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings727w+91
  • What needs to improve63w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
784
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 92%What needs to improve 8%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs C Allison Managing Director The Training and Learning Company Axis 14, Axis Court Riverside Business Park Swansea Vale SA7 0AJ

p.1

apprenticeship training

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 26 November 2009 and subsequent telephone interviews to look at good practice in retail apprenticeship training.

p.1

apprenticeship training

The visit provided valuable information that will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

apprenticeship training

The evidence used to inform the judgements included discussions with key members of staff, learners and key partners and examination of documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice

 The careful recruitment and training of assessors to specifically match employers’ needs. The Training and Learning Company (TLC) takes great care in the recruitment of its assessors. Before advertising positions, the directors visit each employer site to gain an informed view of the expectations and standards of the learners and their managers. This helps TLC to create an assessor profile that matches the employer’s own people specifications. Interviews are then conducted with this profile in mind. For example, an American assessor is posted at a US bank in the City of London and an assessor with 30 years of airline personnel experience is based at Heathrow Airport’s Terminal 5. All new assessors to the business, whether qualified or not, participate in a one- week induction programme. These are usually residential and involve small groups of new staff. Assessors learn the ‘TLC way’ of managing learners and

p.1

Features of good practice

employers. During their induction, each assessor is introduced to the employer they will be working with and visits their sites. TLC assessors are quickly absorbed into the customer’s culture and working practices. Employers report high levels of satisfaction with their assessors and quickly build good working relationships with them.

p.1

Features of good practice

 The outstanding use of work-based assessors to drive learners’ progress and achievement. TLC assessors are permanently based at an employer’s premises for the duration of each contract. The assessor’s attention is firmly focused on the needs of the learners in the context of each employer. They are not distracted by the demands of other employers and do not waste time travelling from site to site. By being at one location, assessors and learners benefit from excellent assessment and teaching opportunities. Assessors are able to optimise the use of observation and witness testimony, especially when unexpected work demands arise for learners. They are also well placed to manage learners on different shift patterns. The result is fast achievement for learners and apprentices can expect to complete their full frameworks within three to six months.

p.2

Features of good practice

 The highly effective use of management information to monitor learners’ progress and staff performance. TLC has developed their own highly effective management information system over the past six years. Extensive data reports are produced at least weekly to ensure each member of staff is meeting their individual and team targets, and that Learning and Skills Council (LSC) funding commitments are being fulfilled. The progress details of each learner are updated daily and checked thoroughly through the internal verification process. Learners have a good understanding of their own achievements and targets. Assessors use the data well to motivate learners and to keep them on track to complete their apprenticeship frameworks.

p.2

Features of good practice

 The excellent quality assurance reporting arrangements that are specific to each employer. TLC has a highly effective quality improvement strategy. In particular, it analyses performance by each employer location and reports directly back to the employer on the findings. The managing director produces a monthly quality report for each employer and presents this during contract review meetings. Data are obtained by using feedback from learners, supervisors and assessors, by observing all aspects of the key learning processes and by statistical analysis of learners’ progress and achievement. Targets are agreed in advance with each employer, which are managed very closely. When TLC has finished at each site, the directors produce a version of a self-assessment report to close off the project and to identify areas of improvement. Employers are very well informed about performance and quality issues. They

p.2

Features of good practice

express high levels of satisfaction in relation to their involvement in raising the standard of training and assessment.

p.2

Areas for development

No key areas for development were identified during the visit.

p.3

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop apprenticeship training in your organisation.

p.3

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local LSC and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion