Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Sims

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Sims

  • Postcode verified

    SW17 7DF

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+64Positivemore positive than 62% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellsuccessfullyrapid progressstrongeffectiveengagingpositiveimproved
Criticismat riskexclusionslowbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings732w+66
  • What needs to improve90w−11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
804
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Chivers and Ms R Sheikh Principals Ernest Bevin College Beechcroft Road Tooting London SW17 7DF

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 4 and 5 November 2009 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included discussions with senior leaders and middle managers. I also visited parts of six lessons, spoke to students and looked at documents including school data and students’ work.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The proportion of students on free school meals who attain five good grades at GCSE including English and mathematics is above the average achieved by all students nationally. There is very little difference in the college between the attainment and achievement of students on free school meals and those who are not. Both groups do very well.  Leaders and managers have a strong commitment to all students doing well. There is no stigma attached to free school meals. For example, the move to a cashless dinner system has meant that these students are not distinguishable.  The school has successfully reduced the proportion of fixed-term exclusions through effective sanctions, such as the referral room and use of rewards, to motivate students. The learning support centre is used well to encourage the re-integration of students by developing their skills of cooperation and teamwork. The proportion of students on free school

p.1

Features of good practice observed

meals who are excluded more than once is very low.  Former students, some of whom acknowledge that they did not behave well when they were younger, have returned as role-models to support younger students, taking responsibilities such as coaching, learning support, and leading after-school activities.  Students acknowledge the consistent approach of teachers towards them; they respond well to the variety of engaging activities and the opportunity to develop their speaking and listening skills through discussion and group work.  Students report that teachers demonstrate their belief in them through the way they speak to them in class and provide positive written feedback on their work. The view of students is that if the school believes in them they will go far.  Students know how well they are doing and are familiar with grade criteria for their coursework marks; they also know what their targets are to

p.2

Features of good practice observed

improve their work. Assessment is used well by teachers to ensure that work set is pitched at the appropriate level of challenge.  Teachers of other subjects use key words well in lessons. They strike a good balance between teaching subject knowledge and key literacy skills. Information and communication technology is also used well to support students’ learning during, and out of, lesson time.  The library is an important resource to support students’ learning and engage students with reading. Tutor time is used well to develop literacy, for example by holding registration time in the library for groups of students.  All of the tutors in each year group belong to the same faculty. This ensures that teachers in that subject get to know one year group very well and this benefits the attainment in that subject. Wherever possible, tutors stay with their groups for five years.  Small groups of students who are significantly below the expected level of

p.2

Features of good practice observed

reading for their age benefit from a synthetic phonics programme that enables them to make rapid progress.  Students throughout the college benefit from additional curriculum time for English. An increasing proportion of students are entered early for English language in November of Year 11. Students are able to focus fully on English literature for the summer examination or retake their language examination in the summer to improve their grade.  The college’s sports specialism has successfully engaged students at risk of disengaging. For some students, the out-of-hours sports has re- engaged them with their learning and improved their attendance. Vocational courses and more flexible ways of learning, such as modular science, engage students in their learning.

p.2

Areas for development

 Ensure that a greater proportion of students achieve the highest possible grades in English language.  Continue to work closely with the parents of the small minority of students whose irregular attendance means they do not do as well as expected.

p.3

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy in your school.

p.3

Areas for development

A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion