Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Mar 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alastair Pearson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alastair Pearson

  • Postcode verified

    TQ4 7EJ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyvery wellstrongconsistentlyclearlyswiftly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings378w+80
  • What needs to improve98w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
470
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 28, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 21%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms P Denham Vice Principal South Devon College Vantage Point Long Road Paignton TQ4 7EJ

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and learners, during my visit on 19 January 2010 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: observations of learning sessions; visits to centres in the community where the college offers learning; discussions with learners, tutors and college managers; and scrutiny of college documents, including recent data on qualification success and self- assessment reports, course and lesson plans and learners’ files.

p.1

Features of good practice

 The college effectively identifies social, physical and educational barriers to literacy learning, recognising clearly where these differ for particular cohorts or individuals. This well-developed understanding is reflected consistently by college managers and staff at all levels.  The college places a strong emphasis on meeting the literacy needs of its learners, effectively prioritising literacy development across the curriculum. Adult and 16 to 19-year-old learners following communication key skills programmes at level 1 and 2 routinely receive helpful in-class additional support, and success rates at level 1 are high.  The college responds very flexibly to the needs of local people, providing a good range of adult provision in diverse community locations including probation offices, primary schools and workplaces, as well as on the college’s main site. Crèche facilities are provided for family literacy

p.1

Features of good practice

learners, and this is a critical factor in enabling them to attend literacy classes.  Literacy learners routinely receive very good initial advice and guidance, and thorough initial assessment of their skills. Information from these enables the college to set learners highly appropriate literacy learning goals, and identify swiftly where learners need additional support.  In the classroom sessions observed, learning was planned very well. Resources were of a high standard. Tutors knew their learners well and put this knowledge to good use in meeting individual literacy needs, particularly those of offenders and ex-offenders.

p.2

Areas for development

 We discussed the need to identify suitably stretching accreditation goals when family literacy learners already have good levels of literacy, so as to recognise appropriately the worthwhile gains they make in understanding language, and applying this to their children’s learning.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning at South Devon College.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local Learning and Skills Council and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion