Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jan Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jan Smith

  • Postcode verified

    W9 2JJ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery effectivesuccessfullyeffectivelyclearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings284w+73
  • What needs to improve101w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
377
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%What needs to improve 26%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms B Holm Head of Service Westminster Adult Education Amberley Road Centre Amberley Road London W9 2JJ

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 10 December 2009 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with senior staff, tutors and learners, two observations of literacy teaching and a review of supporting documentation provided by the college.

p.1

Features of good practice

 The service collaborates successfully with partners to provide for the literacy needs of the most disadvantaged adults in the community, such as those with mental ill health.  The literacy provision is planned effectively to attract new learners through first-step community-based classes, and to support their progress towards participation in mainstream courses.  The service links literacy teaching well to other courses, such as computing, childcare, and jewellery making, to motivate learners and develop their literacy skills.  Tutors understand clearly the importance of helping learners acquire specific literacy skills, such as reading for meaning, decoding words through phonics, and proof-reading.  The service provides very effective additional learning support, including specialist support for dyslexia, to ensure that all learners can make progress in literacy.  Tutors make good use of resources, such as interactive whiteboards and

p.1

Features of good practice

of varied activities, such as word-processing, and craft-making in family learning, to strengthen the development of literacy skills.

p.2

Areas for development

 We discussed the need for the service to build on newly introduced initial assessment procedures to monitor and improve learners’ progress.  We agreed that to raise the level of achievement in literacy further, the service should continue to implement strategies to improve retention.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the college.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local Learning and Skills Council and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion