Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alastair Pearson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alastair Pearson

  • Postcode verified

    OL1 1XJ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+88Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyexcellentvery welloutstandingstrongeffectiveimprovingclearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings389w+88
  • What needs to improve65w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
448
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 32, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms L Fairhurst Head of Service Lifelong Learning Oldham Council Level 9 Civic Centre West Street Oldham OL1 1XJ

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 3 November 2009 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included discussions with: you and your senior curriculum manager; curriculum managers for literacy and numeracy, family learning and English for speakers of other languages; the workforce development manager; the catering services manager; the union learning representative; tutors; and three learners individually. I also observed two learning sessions, and examined of some of your documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The service has a very strong mission to tackle barriers to learning, within which improving literacy is a key component. A detailed, effective Skills for Life strategy and accompanying implementation plan articulates clearly the service’s approach to meeting the literacy needs of local residents.  Managers and staff at all levels have a keen understanding of the barriers learners face to literacy learning. They work effectively to raise the awareness of partner organisations and managers across the council of what these barriers are and their capacity to help learners overcome them.  In the sessions observed, learners received good teaching from expert, well-qualified tutors. Tutors unfailingly treated learners as adults, catering very well for their individual needs and differing ways of learning. Sessions explicitly and effectively focused on how language works, in relevant contexts which interested and engaged learners.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Learning resources for literacy are outstanding. In dispersed community venues and on the main site, learners and tutors make very good use of information learning technology, as well as the highly imaginative, pertinent and well-presented materials that tutors devise.  The excellent support learners receive includes extensive crèche provision and significant help with transport costs. It contributes effectively to encouraging learners to join literacy classes and ensuring they complete them.

p.2

Areas for development

 I did not identify any areas for development.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the service.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local learning and skills council and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion