Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Mar 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jan Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jan Smith

  • Postcode verified

    NG7 1QH

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 82% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery effectivevery wellwell-plannedeffectivelyclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings290w+78
  • What needs to improve104w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
388
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%What needs to improve 26%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms S Mullen Family Learning - Service Manager Nottingham City Council Sandfield Road Lenton Nottingham NG7 1QH

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 22 January 2010 to look at work in literacy at Nottingham City Council (NCC).

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with senior staff, tutors and learners, one observation of literacy teaching, and supporting documentation provided by the college.

p.1

Features of good practice

 Adult learners in deprived areas of the city are achieving well in literacy through the family learning programmes. Success rates for literacy qualifications are high and parents grow in their confidence and capacity to learn. As a result of the skills and knowledge they gain, they are better able to support their children’s literacy development.  The well-planned literacy teaching within family learning programmes has a clear focus on the development of specific language skills. It incorporates a wide variety of teaching and learning strategies that engage learners well and take good account of their individual needs.  NCC has developed highly collaborative partnerships with subcontractors responsible for delivering family learning programmes, managing these very well in a way that supports tutors and encourages providers to share good practice.  NCC has established very effective quality improvement arrangements

p.1

Features of good practice

with college subcontractors, making good use of performance data and sharing responsibility with partners for monitoring the quality of literacy teaching.

p.2

Areas for development

 We discussed how learner diaries might be used more effectively as a springboard for learners’ further literacy development.  We agreed that it would be helpful to review the use of the initial advice and guidance sessions built into longer courses to support literacy learners’ progression.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the Local Authority.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local Learning and Skills Council and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion