Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jane Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jane Jones

  • Postcode verified

    YO7 3NA

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Very positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellenthigh expectationsmake good progressambitiousstrongconsistentlyenthusiastic
Criticismnot alwayslacks

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings711w+53
  • Leadership166w+84
  • What needs to improve93w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
945
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Mackle Headteacher Sessay Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Sessay Thirsk YO7 3NA

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 10 November 2009 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

As outlined in our initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the effectiveness of the school’s approaches to improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with you, your staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of four lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of the subject is good.

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

 Children make a good start to their development of mathematical knowledge and skills in Reception so that all are working within or above the expected levels by the end of the year.  Standards at the end of Key Stage 1 have risen to above average in the last few years. By the end of Key Stage 2, they are consistently above average, sometimes by quite a margin. Around half of the pupils reached Level 5, which is above the standard expected of 11-year-olds, Level 4, which almost all attain.  Pupils make good, and sometimes outstanding, progress throughout their time in the school. This includes those children who are vulnerable or who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, all of whom are supported well in striving to reach their potential. In addition, many more pupils than is typical join the school at times other than at age 4, and especially during the Key Stage 2 years. They settle in very quickly and

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

also make good progress.  Pupils are enthusiastic learners. Behaviour is very good and mature for pupils’ ages. Pupils are attentive and concentrate hard on their work. They particularly enjoy working in groups, using computers, and solving challenging puzzles.

p.2

Quality of teaching of mathematics

The quality of teaching of mathematics is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching of mathematics

 Teaching is good in all four classes. The close-knit, reflective team of staff provides good mutual support and sharing of ideas and experience.  Very good relationships underpin the classroom ethos: high expectations are evident in pupils’ participation and the challenges presented through the range of activities that meet pupils’ needs and abilities. Teaching assistants are skilful and work in seamless partnership with the teachers, for instance, in supporting groups of pupils and in recording responses of particular pupils during whole-class teaching. No time is wasted.  Teachers have good generic teaching skills. Questioning, especially during starter activities, is probing and skilfully varied to ensure pupils of different ages and abilities are challenged to think. There is scope to improve teachers’, and hence pupils’, use of mathematical language so that pupils are better able to express their understanding and reasoning.

p.2

Quality of teaching of mathematics

 Teachers provide opportunities for pupils to solve problems but less often focus on developing their investigative skills. Practical resources are not always exploited to aid the development of pupils’ conceptual understanding.  Teachers mark pupils’ work constructively and provide targets to indicate the next step. Some pupils are more familiar with their curricular targets than others. Useful ‘I can’ sheets are aiding the development of self- assessment by pupils.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is good.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

 Within each of the four mixed-age classes, pupils are grouped appropriately, according to their current levels of attainment. Teachers plan together, using the Primary National Strategy Framework and a wide range of resources. Sometimes, though, planning lacks precision in the intended mathematical gains in learning. While pupils have opportunities to solve problems, their investigative skills are less well developed, particularly their ability to reason, generalise and justify.  Good use is made of the outdoor environment, particularly in the infant classes.  Pupils have many opportunities to use information and communication technology to practise skills and as a tool within mathematics. For instance older pupils’ use of spreadsheets to collate and graph statistical data. The school is currently developing a ‘learning platform’ for staff, pupils and their parents.  Pupils’ learning in mathematics lessons is supplemented by good

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

opportunities to apply mathematics within cross-curricular themes. Their understanding of enterprise is enhanced by an exciting project about managing a company.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management of mathematics

The effectiveness of the leadership and management of mathematics is outstanding.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management of mathematics

 Under your experienced strategic leadership of mathematics, the school is ambitious for each pupil’s achievement and well-being. Staff and pupils have a strong sense of purpose. The school is forward-looking, with staff keen to develop their practice further. The school’s track record of good, and sometimes outstanding, achievement has been maintained in a context of increased mobility of pupils, some of whom have considerable individual needs, and the pleasures and trials of Grade 2* listed accommodation and three ‘temporary’ classrooms. Capacity for further improvement is good.  Your analysis of data and monitoring of pupils’ progress against their targets is excellent. This informs curricular planning, grouping of pupils, and well-tuned intervention for those pupils who need specific help.  The school endeavours to involve parents and keep them informed about their child’s progress and how they can support their learning in

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management of mathematics

mathematics. It aims to strengthen this partnership further through the new learning platform.

p.3

improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

 Close working partnerships ensure that expertise is shared and help teaching in mathematics to keep moving forward. Monitoring identifies general features of teaching well but few improvement points that are mathematics-specific, for instance, on approaches that develop pupils’ conceptual understanding.  Effective use is made of training opportunities within school and through a range of providers. For example, staff have benefited from mathematics courses for teachers in the early stages of their careers and for teaching assistants, as well as on national initiatives such as ‘assessing pupils’ progress’.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 increasing opportunities for pupils to develop their investigative and reasoning skills in mathematics  refining the precision with which teachers plan pupils’ learning in mathematics, paying particular attention to promoting mathematical language and the development of conceptual understanding.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained in our previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion