Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jackie Krafft
- Postcode verified
RM10 8DF
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 23
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr A Fullagar Headteacher Richard Alibon Primary School with ARP for Cognitive and Learning Difficulties: SEN Base Alibon Road Dagenham Essex RM10 8DF
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 16 March 2010 , for the time you gave to our phone discussion and for the information which you provided during my visit. Please also pass my thanks to the pupils, vice-chair of governors, and senior and middle leaders who spoke with me.
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
Since the previous inspection, four members of staff have left and the long-serving headteacher retired. You took over as headteacher the term following the inspection. A newly qualified teacher joined the school last year and another this year.
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
As a result of the inspection on 17 March 2008, the school was asked to: increase the proportion of good teaching in order to accelerate progress and raise standards ensure that subject leaders monitor the quality of teaching and learning across the school with the same rigour as the leaders for English, mathematics and science, in order to raise standards further provide more opportunities for pupils, especially the higher attainers, to learn independently or in small groups and use their initiative.
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made: inadequate progress in making improvements
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
inadequate progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square BRISTOL BS2 8RR T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0845 6404045 Ofstedhelpline@ofsted.gov.uk Page 2 Overall attainment by the time pupils leave the school at the end of Year 6 has fluctuated since the previous inspection and remains below average. Improvements made in English in 2009 were not mirrored in mathematics and there was a decline in science. The school’s own monitoring information indicates that, although pupils are currently on track to meet their English targets, they are not in mathematics. This is a similar position to last year. Overall, all groups of pupils, including the more able, make satisfactory progress during their time at the school. However, evidence from lessons observed, an analysis of the school’s tracking information and scrutiny of books shows that the rate of progress pupils make in different classes and
p.1
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
subjects is too variable. This is because the quality of teaching and learning is inconsistent and there are too many lessons which are inadequate. The school’s monitoring records and lessons seen show that the proportion of good teaching is not increasing enough to accelerate the progress that pupils make and raise attainment consistently.
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
In the most effective lessons, teachers use assessment information well to provide varied activities that are matched carefully to pupils’ different needs. Teachers check throughout the lesson that pupils understand what they are learning so that any misconceptions are spotted and corrected quickly. Skilful questioning engages pupils and challenges them to explain their ideas and develop their learning further so they achieve well. However, these are not consistent features of enough lessons. Where learning is less effective, pupils of different abilities are given the same work to do or work that does not build effectively on what they already know and can do. Consequently, some find it too easy and others too difficult. Pupils noted that, although they enjoy their lessons, ‘sometimes our teachers work with the same children every day and not with others who also need help’. When teachers talk for
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
too long in lessons, there are missed opportunities to involve pupils and develop their independence, so some lose concentration and the progress they make is limited. Pupils are given appropriate opportunities to work together in pairs and small groups but this is not consistently well-planned or monitored during lessons to ensure that all pupils are participating fully in the activity or working at an appropriately challenging pace, including the more able. Teachers ensure that pupils know what they are expected to learn in each lesson and give them clear criteria by which they can measure their success. Pupils are given increasing opportunities to evaluate their own learning and that of their peers but this is not yet fully embedded throughout the school.
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
The headteacher has an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement, but the pace of change has been too slow for the school to demonstrate that it has a better capacity for sustained improvement. The progress that pupils make is tracked systematically. Regular meetings with teachers have been introduced to discuss pupils’ progress, which is linked to performance management so that staff can be held to account more robustly. Necessary steps are being taken to manage underperformance and plans are being developed to strengthen the senior leadership team. There have been changes to the leadership of different subjects since the previous inspection and many are new to their role. Page 3 Subject leaders are now working together in teams and systems are being put in place for them to monitor the quality of provision in the subjects they lead. External support through London Challenge has recently been secured to help improve the
p.2
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
consistency of teaching and develop the skills of leaders at all levels. However, much has been introduced recently and is still too new to demonstrate an impact on making improvements in the areas identified at the previous inspection. The school’s development plan includes the right priorities and some quantifiable measures of success, but the lack of clear milestones against which to evaluate the progress being made is not supporting more rapid improvement.
p.3
Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools
I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion