Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Mar 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Sims

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Sims

  • Postcode verified

    SY7 0AA

Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
26
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%About the inspection 97%

Full report text

PROTECT-INSPECTION

September 2009 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 1 11 February 2010

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Miss A Cook Headteacher Saint Mary’s Church of England Primary School Chapel Lawn Road Bucknell Shropshire SY7 0AA

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 10 February 2010 , for the time you gave to our discussions and for the information which you provided before and during my visit . Please pass on my thanks to the staff and pupils I spoke to and to the Chair of Governors and representative from the local authority who also took time to meet with me.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Since the last inspection a new chair of the governing body has been elected and there is a new Key Stage 1 teacher in place. Your secondment as acting headteacher has now been made a permanent appointment.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

As a result of the inspection on 26 February 2008, the school was asked to ensure that all pupils know their targets and understand what to do to improve so that standards and achievement rise; use assessment information to ensure that the curriculum is better matched to all pupils' needs, particularly higher attaining pupils; and improve the capacity of the governing body to hold the school to account. Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Pupils join the school at broadly average starting points. After the last inspection standards at the end of Key Stage 1 fell to below the national averages. Standards in are now back on track and improving as a result of changes made in the provision of teaching. By the end of Year 6 pupils reach standards which are broadly in line with those expected for their age because of good teaching in Key Stage 2. Examination Serco Boundary House 2, Wythall Green Way Wythall Birmingham West Midlands B47 6LW T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 683 2048 Victoria.mortimore2@serco.com

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

September 2009 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 2 results are better in mathematics and reading than in writing. Consequently, pupils make satisfactory progress overall in their learning.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The school took swift action to address weaknesses in the governing body. The resulting changes mean that it now takes a more formal approach to its duties, as reflected in the minutes of meetings and the establishment of committees. Governors have been trained in the analysis of data to evaluate pupil performance so that they can carry out their role to hold the school to account more effectively. They know the strengths and weaknesses of the school well but are at an early stage of involvement in its self evaluation process. Overall, good progress has been made against this area for development.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

You and the governors continue to focus on raising standards for higher attaining pupils. Although recent tests and assessments do not yet reflect the actions taken, much has been done to ensure that, in future, more pupils will achieve the highest possible levels of attainment. Wherever possible, the large Key Stage 2 class is divided to enable teaching to be focussed at a narrower range of ages and ability. Teaching assistants are used well to achieve this. Younger pupils are sometimes placed with older ones to give them access to more challenging work. There are good links with the local secondary school to provide additional activities for pupils. The curriculum is enriched well by specialist sport, music and French teaching. Pupils enjoy the after-school mathematics booster class. The school has made satisfactory progress against this area for development. However, learning objectives in lessons

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

are at times too broad to meet the needs of different learners.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Pupils are set challenging targets to aspire to higher levels of attainment. Current tracking of progress indicates that more pupils than in previous years are well placed to achieve this by the end of Key Stages 1 and 2. Pupils usually know what is expected of them and how they can improve their work. At its best, marking is informative and challenges pupils but it is inconsistent in its quality. As a result, older pupils do not always know their level of attainment or how to reach the next level. The school has made satisfactory progress against this area for development.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Robust safeguarding arrangements are in place to ensure pupils’ safety and security. You have worked well with the local authority which has given you good support to provide strong leadership and management in order to bring about an increased capacity to improve for the future.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion