Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Jun 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Lynes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Lynes

  • Postcode verified

    SE6 4NL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
14
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Mrs N Maharasingam The Headteacher Rathfern Primary School Rathfern Road Catford London SE6 4NL

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 27 May 2010, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during my visit.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

There has been a high turnover of staff since the last inspection. This is partly attributable to robust procedures to deal with underperformance, and partly to unforeseeable personal circumstances relating to a number of individual staff. A new deputy headteacher, with significant expertise in strategies to improve literacy, has been very recently appointed. The number of pupils either leaving or starting at other than the beginning of the school year continues to be much higher than is typically found.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

As a result of the inspection on 5 and 6 June 2008, the school was asked to:

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

 raise standards and achievement in English, mathematics and science for all pupils by ensuring consistently high expectations of what they can do  ensure pupils know what they need to do to improve by setting learning targets that clearly indicate the next steps in learning  raise standards and improve pupils' achievement in writing, particularly spelling, punctuation and grammar.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made: good progress in making improvements

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square BRISTOL BS2 8RR T 0300 123 4234 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0300 123 4234 Ofstedhelpline@ofsted.gov.uk Page 2 Standards are slowly beginning to rise. Validated data for the 2009 Key Stage 2 test results show that attainment remains below average. Attainment in English improved significantly, whilst in mathematics and science it declined. Because these pupils’ attainment at Key Stage 1 had been exceptionally low, this represented good progress in English, and satisfactory progress in mathematics and science. The pupils currently completing Key Stage 2 attained below, but broadly average results at the end of Key Stage 1. The school was able to provide convincing evidence that these pupils are on track to meet their targets. If they do so this will represent good progress.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

The headteacher has high expectations which other senior and middle leaders clearly share. These expectations are most obviously evidenced by the consistently high quality of displays which help to create a very attractive learning environment. Parents have started to pick up on these higher expectations and are now far more involved in the life of the school. Results from surveys conducted by the school indicate an increasingly strong level of parental support. The headteacher has improved teaching by dealing robustly with any underperformance and by offering good support, which includes the judicious use of external partners. As a result, the school has made good progress in raising expectations of what pupils can achieve.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

The headteacher has taken the lead role for improving assessment, and progress in this area is good. There is a more rigorous system of half-termly tracking which provides teachers with useful information. Teachers are using this to plan more effective lessons, but could make even greater use of the information on progress to plan for differentiation more precisely. Pupils now know the levels they are working at and most can identify the next steps to improve their learning. This much improved monitoring has enabled the school to identify that progress in writing remains a key area for improvement. Pupils do not make enough progress in Years 4 and 5 in writing, although they do better in Year 6. There are appropriate plans to bring about improvement, and progress in improving writing is satisfactory.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Evidence from this inspection tends to support the school’s view that more than half of teaching is at least good. This is as a result of higher expectations and a better use of assessment information. The headteacher is an astute judge of the quality of teaching. She is able to identify accurately strengths and weaknesses. Pace still remains an issue, even in the better lessons. Pupils responded extremely well to the crisp, confident teaching exemplified by a Year 6 literacy lesson. When teaching is not of this quality pupils’ attention tends to drift and their behaviour can deteriorate. This was most apparent in a Key Stage 1 lesson.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

The school has made good progress on two of the key issues and accurately judges that there is more to do to improve writing. It has therefore demonstrated good progress in improving capacity. It is still receiving good quality support from London Challenge. It will be important that as the new staff, and in particular the deputy headteacher, grow into their roles the school reduces its reliance on this support. This will be crucial to demonstrating securely good capacity by the time of the next inspection. Page 3 I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion