Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony O’Malley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony O’Malley

  • Postcode verified

    B12 8EH

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 55% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlysecureaccurately

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings28w0
  • What needs to improve99w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
126
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 20%About the inspection 75%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms A Zohhadi Nelson Mandela School Colville Road Sparkbrook Birmingham B12 8EH

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 3 November 2009 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included discussions with senior leaders and the literacy coordinator, meetings with pupils, examination of school documentation and five lesson observations.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 You and other school leaders keep a sharp focus on maintaining high standards in literacy within a rich curriculum that the pupils enjoy greatly. Each term, senior leaders and teachers review how well pupils are progressing in reading and writing. This ensures that they can identify quickly any underachievement by pupils or groups.  Almost all children start Nursery with very little knowledge of English. Yet because of outstanding provision, they have above average reading and writing skills by the end of Year 2. Pupils continue to make outstanding progress from Years 3 to 6. In the statutory tests at the end of Year 6 in 2009, over half of them attained Level 5 in English.  Boys love reading and writing and attain the same high standards as girls. The 40% of pupils entitled to free school meals achieve above average standards in English.  All staff celebrate their pupils’ bilingualism and multilingualism as

p.1

Features of good practice observed

evidence of their skills as learners. Staff have correspondingly high expectations of the pupils’ cognitive abilities when teaching reading and writing.  In lessons and through marking, teachers provide encouragement and practical guidance on areas for improvement. Pupils recognise how this support helps them to become better readers and writers.  Because of the school’s outstanding focus on building self-esteem, pupils are confident to ask and answer questions. They do not worry about getting something wrong.  Displays around the school celebrate the pupils’ high-quality writing. These, and work in books, demonstrate well the pupils’ skills at organising their ideas logically, spelling accurately and forming letters correctly.

p.1

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that: - all teachers are able to assess written work accurately - teachers apply assessment criteria consistently throughout the school so that, for example, secure Level 3 writing in Key Stage 1 shares the same attributes as secure Level 3 writing in Key Stage 2.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy in the school.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion