Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Lindfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Lindfield

  • Postcode verified

    E14 3NE

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+83Very positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenthigh expectationsrapid progressstrengthsecureclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings390w+82
  • What needs to improve127w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
511
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%What needs to improve 25%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs R Bruce Headteacher Cubitt Town Junior School Manchester Road Isle of Dogs London E14 3NE

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 4 November 2009 to look at work to overcome pupils’ socio- economic barriers to attain or exceed nationally expected levels for their age in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included discussions with senior leaders, middle managers and parents. I also visited seven lessons; three of these were intervention activities with small groups of pupils and one was with a group of parents. I interviewed pupils and scrutinised the school’s assessment data and documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The school’s engagement with parents is a considerable strength and helps to raise pupils’ achievement. Parents speak of their involvement with the school making an ‘amazing difference in their relationships with their child’. The well-organised parent liaison coordinator is adept at identifying opportunities to expand the already wide range of courses provided by the school. Parents from all of the diverse cultural and ethnic groups within the local community attend these sessions. The coordinator has taken action to encourage a greater proportion of fathers and male carers to attend.  Teachers set high expectations by making good use of pupils’ previous writing outcomes as exemplars. Teachers’ questions and interventions, borne from secure subject knowledge, develop pupils’ writing skills well. For example, on one occasion, the class teacher explained that inserting an adjective would help the reader to be more sympathetic to the

p.1

Features of good practice observed

character in the story.  Pupils who speak English as an additional language respond well to stimulating and enjoyable lessons and make rapid progress. Characterised by good planning and high levels of organisation, lessons draw on a range of resources featuring puppets, computers and visual prompts. The teacher’s excellent subject knowledge is used in a carefully planned sequence to reinforce the learning of new language skills.

p.2

Areas for development

 Increase the opportunities for extending pupils’ speaking and listening skills by making greater use of talking partners.  Direct more questions at specific pupils to ensure that all have the opportunity and the encouragement to respond and develop their understanding.  Further refine assessment materials to provide clear indicators of the effectiveness of the teaching of phonics. Ensure that all those involved in providing the phonics programme, particularly teaching assistants, are trained regularly.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion