Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Lindfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Lindfield

  • Postcode verified

    SE28 0EA

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+83Very positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingclearclearlyconsistentlyskilledeffectiveimproved

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings534w+83
  • What needs to improve111w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
638
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 17%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr N Prockter Headteacher Heronsgate Primary School Whinchat Road London SE28 0EA

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 3 November 2009 to look at work to overcome pupils’ socio- economic barriers to attain or exceed nationally expected levels for their age in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included discussions with senior leaders and middle managers. I also visited three lessons, conducted a learning walk, interviewed pupils and scrutinised the school’s assessment data and documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 You communicate your vision to drive the school forward clearly. Together with your senior leadership team, you set the highest expectations for staff, pupils and parents. The school is an inspiring and purposeful environment where all pupils are given opportunities to reach and even exceed nationally expected levels.  Pupils’ behaviour is consistently good and they adopt a mature approach to learning. The school’s emphasis on developing speaking skills has resulted in pupils of all abilities willingly articulating their personal thoughts and emotions. This has increased pupils’ precision in their choice of words and, consequently, their oral and written communication skills.  The teaching I observed was outstanding. Each lesson had a clear developmental sequence starting with explanations of learning which linked to pupils’ previous learning. Teachers were skilled at anticipating pupils’ likely misconceptions and provided clear and detailed expectations

p.1

Features of good practice observed

of a ‘good piece’ of work. Learning was reinforced by the teacher modelling an example of a ‘good piece’ of work and then immediately asking pupils to apply their new learning. Finally, teachers gave clear feedback on how well pupils met their targets and what they could do next time to improve.  The use of role-play areas across the school is effective in encouraging speaking skills and developing pupils’ vocabulary. Role-play themes included popular novels, history topics or class projects. For example, a Second World War role-play area included speaking prompts and technical words on display. These were accompanied by visual images and historical artefacts. Ration books were displayed alongside recipe books with laminated speech bubbles used to record pupils’ thoughts and ideas. Historical costumes and copies of a script which featured four characters further encouraged pupils’ use of historical language.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 Success criteria are explained clearly to pupils and referred to throughout the lessons to set clear and challenging expectations. Pupils understood their targets and were immediately rewarded for including these elements in their work. Pupils’ learning improved where they used these success criteria to evaluate each other’s work.  You carefully monitor and analyse your intervention strategies. By regularly gathering and reviewing relevant data, you evaluate how well they enable pupils to make progress. This, in turn, gives you the confidence to only use strategies that work for your pupils.

p.2

Areas for development

 We discussed the school’s use of targets to raise standards. Pupils have a good understanding of the targets to improve their writing in four key areas; use of connectives, vocabulary, punctuation and in the openings to their writing. However, they are less sure of their targets to improve sentence structure, to make further progress in their writing.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion