Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gill Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gill Jones

  • Postcode verified

    SE16 4SU

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandinghigh-qualityeffectivelyexcellenthigh expectationsconfidentlyloverich
Criticismseriously

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings538w+84
  • What needs to improve70w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
598
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 88%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs K Willis Headteacher St James’ Church of England Primary School Old Jamaica Road Bermondsey SE16 4SU

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 3 November 2009 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: discussions with the chair of governors, parents, senior leaders and the literacy coordinator; meetings with pupils; scrutiny of school documentation; and observation of lessons, activities and clubs.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Your vision, shared by the staff, of a curriculum based on high-quality speaking, listening, reading and writing activities is paramount in enabling all pupils, particularly those who are most vulnerable, to gain success in literacy.  You set high expectations for all pupils. Poverty is not used as an excuse for underachievement. Pupils’ progress in reading and writing is monitored thoroughly. Pupils’ achievement in literacy is outstanding and the attainment of pupils eligible for free school meals is well above that found nationally.  The teaching I observed was outstanding. For example, pupils in Year 2 were entranced by Harry and the robot. The teacher’s skilful dramatisation of the story enabled vulnerable pupils to become confident in using adjectives they learnt during the lesson in their writing.  The outstanding curriculum is relevant to children’s knowledge and extends their life experience. For example, the study of climate change in

p.1

Features of good practice observed

Year 6 stimulated high-quality debate. Sensitively chosen resources and space for drama activities in the classroom, such as the Greenpeace news desk, enabled pupils to become fully immersed in their work and to confidently produce highly emotive writing in different genres.  Staff model spoken language effectively. Pupils appreciate staff correcting their grammar and self-correct when speaking formally to adults. The pupils interviewed gave good examples of local colloquialisms they avoid in speech and in their writing.  Pupils say they love reading and eagerly attend the school’s reading clubs. Year 6 pupils take their responsibility as reading buddies seriously, regularly using their lunchtimes to help younger pupils learn to read. All pupils observed read confidently, using different voices to express emotion and responding well to punctuation. They say they ‘love being read to by teachers because they make stories come to life’. The school has a rich

p.2

Features of good practice observed

selection of books and all pupils read out loud daily.  Literacy is managed well. The coordinator has excellent subject knowledge shared effectively with staff. Clear policies for reading, spelling and handwriting are applied consistently across the school.  You target the extensive extended school activities well to meet the needs of all pupils, particularly the most vulnerable.  Partnerships are used effectively to support pupils’ learning. You are imaginative in gaining support from local businesses and make good use of the culturally rich local environment to raise pupils’ aspirations.

p.2

Areas for development

 Provide further opportunities and space for developing family literacy, particularly where parents can learn alongside their children.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy in the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion