Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Michael McIlroy
- Postcode verified
WF13 2DQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop modern languages in the school. p.4
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.4
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 766
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs L Mortimer Headteacher Carlton Junior and Infant School Off Upper Road Batley Carr Dewsbury WF13 2DQ
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – modern languages
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 5 October 2009, to look at work in modern languages (ML).
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – modern languages
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on how well the school is implementing entitlement in Key Stage 2.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – modern languages
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – modern languages
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of four lessons.
p.1
Context
French was introduced in 2006. The vast majority of pupils speak English as an additional language and many enter the school with little or no English.
p.1
Achievement in primary languages
Pupils’ speaking skills are developing well. They are able to ask basic questions and hold simple conversations. Their pronunciation is satisfactory and their range of vocabulary is growing. Most listen well in class and are keen to practise new learning. Pupils have some opportunities to develop their reading skills through reading from interactive whiteboards and a number of appropriate French language books. However, writing is underdeveloped. Older pupils have few opportunities to write in French.
p.1
Achievement in primary languages
Pupils’ knowledge about language is developing satisfactorily.
p.2
Achievement in primary languages
Pupils’ intercultural understanding is underdeveloped and their awareness of how learning a language can benefit their future careers is at an early stage of development.
p.2
Achievement in primary languages
Pupils enjoy learning languages and it makes a good contribution to their personal development.
p.2
Quality of teaching of primary languages
Teachers’ subject knowledge is good overall as is their pronunciation.
p.2
Quality of teaching of primary languages
There is good use of the target language in most lessons for older pupils. In some lessons, opportunities to use French were missed.
p.2
Quality of teaching of primary languages
Additional adults are used well to support learning in class. In a Year 3 lesson, a teaching assistant worked well with a group of pupils to help them to practise responses to simple questions.
p.2
Quality of teaching of primary languages
Teachers use their pedagogical skills well to make learning interesting. Teaching was usually fast paced and employed a range of activities, although some activities needed clearer explanation. The quality of planning is variable. Some lacks detail and some does not indicate how the needs of pupils of different abilities will be met.
p.2
Quality of teaching of primary languages
Information and communication technology (ICT) is generally used well to introduce new vocabulary and to give pupils opportunities to listen to native French speakers. In one lesson, pupils watched an appropriate DVD recording of French pupils stating their names.
p.2
Quality of teaching of primary languages
In some lessons, teachers use language learning strategies well. Pupils stated that cognates were used to help them remember new words.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in primary languages
All pupils in Key Stages 1 and 2 learn French. The time allocated is suitable. Pupils have a weekly half hour lesson, with regular reinforcement of learning later in the week.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in primary languages
The model of delivery is sustainable. Most classes are taught by class teachers and one is taught by an external specialist teacher. The scheme of work used by the school is appropriate and broadly meets the needs of learners. However, the assessment opportunities of the scheme are not fully exploited.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in primary languages
Learning is supported satisfactorily by display. Pupils are able to access some useful French language websites.
p.3
Quality of the curriculum in primary languages
The curriculum is enriched by annual theme weeks. In the European week pupils celebrated five different languages and cultures. These theme weeks offer pupils opportunities to be creative in their learning, such as making models and designing new national flags.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in primary languages
You and the senior leadership team are supportive of modern languages teaching and have supported the acting subject leader well.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in primary languages
The rationale for choosing French is clear. Secondary school provision has been taken into account.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in primary languages
In the unavoidable absence of the subject leader, the acting subject manager provides sound leadership for the subject. The rolling programme to introduce French into all classes in Key Stage 2 has been successfully continued.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in primary languages
A policy for modern languages exists and there is also a brief action plan. Good links have been established with local high schools and a specialist teacher from one teaches one class.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in primary languages
The subject leader has attended training courses and also run courses within school for all teaching staff to develop their language skills.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in primary languages
The monitoring of teaching and learning is at an early stage of development as are assessment procedures.
p.3
Progress towards entitlement in Key Stage 2
This is satisfactory. There is a clear rationale for the teaching of French and an effective model of delivery. ICT is used well to enhance learning. Both boys and girls have positive attitudes towards learning languages. Assessment and recording of pupils’ progress are at an early stage of development.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
providing opportunities for older pupils to develop their skills in reading, and particularly in writing
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
developing assessment and recording procedures so that pupils, the school and secondary schools have a clear picture of the level of pupils’ skills developing pupils’ intercultural understanding and their appreciation of the usefulness of languages.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop modern languages in the school.
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion