Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jonathan Palk

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jonathan Palk

  • Postcode verified

    WS8 7LW

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentexemplaryoutstandinghigh-qualitystrongeffectivelypreciselyeffective
Criticismat riskfalling behind

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings462w+73
  • What needs to improve76w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
531
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs L Powell Headteacher Watling Street Primary School Watling Street Brownhills Walsall WS8 7LW

p.1

literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 3 November 2009 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: discussions with senior leaders, literacy and assessment coordinators; discussions with the Early Years Foundation Stage leader; meetings with pupils; analysis of data; and lesson observations.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The consistent focus on the assessment of learning by all staff ensured that the standards in teaching and learning, in the lessons seen, were outstanding.  The high-quality assessments of pupils’ progress are moderated thoroughly and provide excellent information about all aspects of pupils’ literacy development. The information is used effectively to raise the expectations of pupils and teachers and is instrumental in closing the gap for those at risk of falling behind.  Targets are explained precisely to the pupils at the start, during and on completion of work. These are underpinned by exemplary marking. Staff frequently demand that pupils seek to improve the quality of their vocabulary, syntax and grammar by reference to ‘up levelling’, or going that ‘one step better’. Pupils know their levels and precisely how well they are progressing.  The school’s commitment to training and development ensures that staff

p.1

Features of good practice observed

have excellent subject knowledge in literacy. Close working relationships result in impressive teamwork and frequent professional discourse on the most effective teaching and learning strategies.  The school’s strong emphasis on developing speaking and listening skills is having a profound effect on improving pupils’ writing skills. A good range of structured opportunities were recognised in the most recent Ofsted inspection report. These have been built upon by providing more opportunities for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage to engage in purposeful talk.  Pupils’ writing is of a consistently high standard across the curriculum. Pupils always write in their literacy book, regardless of the subject, and staff mark all work to the same agreed criteria. Staff expectations are high. Interventions match the needs of the pupils well and, from the outset, are compiled with clear objectives. They rarely entail removing

p.2

Features of good practice observed

pupils from lessons. The school has the confidence to adapt recognised intervention strategies to suit its own context. The pupils I met spoke positively about how much they enjoy writing.

p.2

Areas for development

 We discussed the need to develop partnerships with secondary schools to ensure the gains made by this group of pupils are sustained.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion