Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Allan Torr
- Postcode verified
PR5 4TD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop healthier eating and provision for food in the school. p.4
- As I explained during the feedback, this letter will be copied to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.4
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment5
“The school’s management of teaching, learning and the curriculum is excellent.” p.3Leadership & governance4
“The school’s management of teaching, learning and the curriculum is excellent.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 830
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs C Entwistle Headteacher Walton-le-Dale Community Primary School Severn Drive Walton-le-Dale Preston Lancashire PR5 4TD
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Healthy eating in schools
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, pupils and parents, during my visit with my colleagues from the School Food Trust on 7 October 2009, to look at your work on healthier eating and school food provision.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Healthy eating in schools
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our evaluation and reporting. Any published report is likely to list the names of the institutions visited, but we would not identify individual institutions within the report itself.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Healthy eating in schools
The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with parents and pupils; scrutiny of school documentation, including your policies and evidence of pupils’ work; observation of two lessons, as well as the breakfast club and the school at lunchtime.
p.1
The quality of provision to promote healthy eating
The quality of provision to promote healthy eating is good.
p.1
(DCSF’s) food-based and nutrient-based standards for school food
Compliance with the DCSF’s food-based and nutrient-based standards for school food is satisfactory. The school, working with the caterer, complies with most of the nutrient- based standards for school lunches, but does not yet meet all of the food- based standards.
p.1
The quality of the dining experience
The quality of the dining experience is satisfactory.
p.2
The quality of the dining experience
The quality of school meals is satisfactory. The take up of school meals is very low; this is in part because the cost is relatively high. It is also because pupils cannot sit easily with their friends; those on hot dinners do not sit with those on packed lunches. Pupils and parents are not as involved as they could be in shaping menus and food that appeal to pupils at Walton-le-Dale.
p.2
The quality of the dining experience
The Key Stage 1 hall is too noisy and is understaffed. The hatch is too high for young pupils to see the choices on offer and pupils cannot sit easily with their friends.
p.2
Helping pupils and parents to make healthier choices
Strategies for helping pupils and parents to make healthier choices are satisfactory.
p.2
Helping pupils and parents to make healthier choices
The school uses a variety of strategies to engage parents in supporting pupils’ healthier choices. Newsletters convey information about the food on offer at school, access to water, healthy eating lessons and themed weeks, and about school lunches.
p.2
Helping pupils and parents to make healthier choices
Parents and pupils have little influence or input into the types of food served. Many of those we spoke to during our visit said the meals were too costly, there were not many choices, and popular meals ran out so some pupils were left with very little that they liked to eat.
p.2
Helping pupils and parents to make healthier choices
Parents and pupils were very enthusiastic about the cookery club in Year 2. This was effective in encouraging healthy eating and teaching about how to prepare and make healthy food.
p.2
Development of pupils’ knowledge and personal skills
Development of pupils’ knowledge and personal skills is good.
p.2
Development of pupils’ knowledge and personal skills
Pupils talked with confidence about making healthy food choices. They understood the importance of taking exercise and eating sensibly. This was particularly noticeable in Key Stage 1. The youngest children could articulate what sorts of foods and ingredients should be eaten sometimes, often or rarely. Many pupils could explain what should or should not be included in packed lunches or school meals to help them to be healthy.
p.2
Teaching about healthier eating
Teaching about healthier eating is outstanding.
p.3
Teaching about healthier eating
Pupils make very good progress because they are actively involved from an early age in cutting, making and evaluating food. This work encourages pupils to cook and develops their understanding of how to prepare and cook fresh foods, so they can make a wide range of meals from raw ingredients.
p.3
Teaching about healthier eating
Pupils made very good progress in their vocabulary, as well as in their skills and understanding.
p.3
Planning the curriculum
Healthy eating and nutrition are taught in science, design and technology, physical education, and personal and social development. The school has devised the curriculum well so that it is coherent and pupils are able to make very good progress in their skills and understanding.
p.3
Leadership and management
Leadership and management are satisfactory.
p.3
Leadership and management
The school’s management of teaching, learning and the curriculum is excellent. The teaching staff are motivated, committed and are part of a team delivering high quality outcomes for pupils.
p.3
Leadership and management
The management of the food service is just satisfactory. Pupils and parents are not as involved as they could be. Governors have not successfully fulfilled their role in monitoring the food- and nutrient-based standards to ensure the school is fully compliant. The caterer has not taken effective action to ensure meals are cooked in the right way to meet the standards.
p.3
Leadership and management
Neither the school nor the caterer has taken effective action so far to improve the dining experience or to increase the proportion of pupils taking a nutritious meal. Neither have they monitored or evaluated the uptake of meals for different groups of pupils.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:
Improve the dining experience for all pupils, particularly those in Key Stage 1 by:
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:
−increasing the staffing in the Key Stage 1 dining room and ensuring pupils can see the meal choices −enabling pupils on packed lunches to sit with pupils on school meals −ensuring the noise levels are acceptably low
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:
Improve the quality of monitoring and evaluation to ensure the school:
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:
−complies with all food and nutrient-based standards −is able to monitor the uptake of meals for different groups of pupils
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:
Increase the uptake of school meals by:
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:
−identifying and tackling barriers to increasing the number of hot meals taken by pupils −involving pupils and parents more in shaping the menus and options for Walton-le-Dale primary
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop healthier eating and provision for food in the school.
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:
As I explained during the feedback, this letter will be copied to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion