Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Nov 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michelle Parker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michelle Parker

  • Postcode verified

    WF2 7QW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 84% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentpositivelyoutstandinggood progressconfidentimprovingconsistent
Criticismnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings363w+78
  • Leadership40w+50
  • What needs to improve81w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
472
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 45
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 6%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 30%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs C Platts Headteacher Hendal Primary School Hendal Lane Kettlethorpe Wakefield WF2 7QW

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Healthy eating in schools

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, pupils and parents, during my visit with my colleague from the School Food Trust on 7 October 2009, to look at your work on healthier eating and school food provision.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Healthy eating in schools

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our evaluation and reporting. Any published report is likely to list the names of the institutions visited, but we would not identify individual institutions within the report itself.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Healthy eating in schools

The evidence base used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with parents, pupils and staff; scrutiny of school documentation, such as your school evaluation and school food policy; analysis of pupils’ work, and observation of ten lessons, an assembly and school lunch.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Healthy eating in schools

I undertook to provide a brief written version of the main points made in our feedback at the end of the visit, to support development in healthier eating and school meals.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Healthy eating in schools

The quality of provision to promote healthy eating is good.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Healthy eating in schools

The quality of provision to promote healthy eating is good.

p.1

(DCSF) food-based and nutrient-based standards for school food

Compliance with the DCSF food-based and nutrient-based standards for school food is outstanding.  The school meets all the food-based standards for school lunches and breakfasts. It complies with all the nutrient-based standards for school lunches.

p.1

The quality of the dining experience

The quality of the dining experience is good.

p.2

The quality of the dining experience

 Pupils are actively involved in improving the dining experience. They suggested the brightly-coloured tablecloths which look really cheerful. Pupils like being able to choose where they sit.

p.2

The quality of the dining experience

 Queuing is kept to a minimum. Pupils have plenty of time to eat their meals and talk to their friends. Staff eat with pupils and this impacts positively on the quality of the dining experience. Behaviour is good.

p.2

Helping pupils and parents to make healthier choices

Strategies for helping pupils and parents to make healthier choices are good.

p.2

Helping pupils and parents to make healthier choices

 Parents spoke positively about the guidance the school provides for healthy eating. They were pleased their children eat more fruit and fewer sweets. They found the school’s advice for packed lunches helpful.

p.2

Development of pupils’ knowledge and personal skills

Development of pupils’ knowledge and personal skills is good.

p.2

Development of pupils’ knowledge and personal skills

 Pupils knew how to make healthy choices about the food they select. They enjoyed the many opportunities for cooking. They were appropriately reminded and encouraged to drink water. They understand how to choose a balanced diet and the need for the ‘five a day’ helpings of fruit and vegetables.

p.2

Teaching about healthier eating

Teaching about healthier eating is good.

p.2

Teaching about healthier eating

 Pupils have plenty of opportunities to handle fresh ingredients and make dishes from them. Good use is made of the new food technology room. A good range of food preparation activities were observed in the lessons seen. Pupils from the foundation stage made vegetable soup and fruit salad, older pupils made bread and Mediterranean roast vegetables. Pupils tasted a wide range of different and exotic fruit which they were also encouraged to draw and name.  The new school garden provides pupils with an excellent insight into food production. Pupils are able to prepare, cook and eat the fruit and vegetables they have grown.

p.2

Planning the curriculum

 Healthy-eating messages are consistent. Planning in staff teams ensures all teachers are confident about introducing food work. However, planning is not formally coordinated to ensure there is good progress across the key stages; so higher attaining pupils may not always be sufficiently challenged.

p.3

Leadership and management

Leadership and management are outstanding.

p.3

Leadership and management

 Your vision for the school is shared by all staff, including the school cook and her staff. Everyone values pupils as individuals. Pupils’ opinions are frequently sought and, as much as possible, acted upon.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

 further develop the planning to ensure continuity and the progression of knowledge about ‘healthy eating’ to ensure that higher attaining pupils are appropriately challenged.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop healthier eating and provision for food in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

As I explained during the feedback, this letter will be copied to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion