Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    B3 1LH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenthighly skilledoutstandingsuccessfullyconsistentlytimelyimprovedengaging
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
715
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms S Tipton Managing Director Protocol Consultancy Services Canterbury House 85 New Hall Street Birmingham B3 1LH

p.1

in work-related education and training

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation during my visit on 16 November 2009. I am particularly grateful to you and all your staff for the hard work involved in preparing for the visit and for giving up a great deal of time during the visit to meet me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned.

p.1

in work-related education and training

The visit provided valuable information that will contribute to our national survey of good practice in the role that employers play in work-related education and training. Published reports are likely to list the names of contributing organisations but individual organisations will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

in work-related education and training

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with five staff, three employers and five learners; scrutiny of examples of good practice provided; and a review of a range of documents, case studies and data.

p.1

in work-related education and training

I agreed to provide a summary of the good practice seen and to identify some areas for development and outline the main findings below.

p.1

The main strengths

 Overall success rates are consistently outstanding. In 2007/08, all leavers completed their frameworks, and completion rates for 2008/09 are 96%. Timely success rates have improved from 66% in 2005/06 to 92% in 2008/09, which is significantly higher than the national average of 46%. In the current year, all 19 leavers have achieved their frameworks on time.  Employers are encouraged to be fully and actively involved in learners’ programmes from the start. Protocol Consultancy Services (PCS) staff brief employers fully on the programme. Employers are aware of their expected commitment and contribution to the programmes. They participate in choosing relevant National Vocational Qualifications (NVQ) and option units to suit the job role.  PCS makes excellent use of workplace mentors to guide and mentor the learner through their programme. PCS trains the mentors well and provides them with a detailed handbook outlining their role and

p.1

The main strengths

responsibilities. The mentor is involved in progress reviews and target- setting and is instrumental in motivating the learner to make good and timely progress.  On- and off-the-job training is coordinated well. Assessors are flexible, visit the workplace regularly and communicate well with the employer. The workplace mentor is involved in day-to-day supervision and, therefore, can provide training that has been agreed at reviews and assessment planning meetings. Feedback is regularly sought from employers, so they can influence the training. Particularly good use is made of the Assessment of Prior Learning and professional discussion on advanced apprenticeships programmes, which employers and learners appreciate as it avoids duplication of training and assessment.  PCS is successfully engaging unemployed 16- to 18-year-olds by directly funding a pre-apprenticeship programme for customer service and

p.2

The main strengths

administration. Learners are placed with employers for a period of work experience, at the same time receiving intensive training by PCS for key skills, the technical certificate and aspects of the NVQ. The work experience acts as a trial period, and usually results in learners progressing to the apprenticeship programme.  Employers benefit significantly from involvement in PCS’s programmes. Learners develop excellent customer service skills and confidence, improving the employers’ reputation and business. Employers gain highly skilled workers, and because of their close involvement, are able to identify and train learners for promotion. Learners also feel more motivated and valued by their employers.

p.2

The main area for further development is:

 involving more employers in developing occupational case studies and e- learning packages, to make Skills for Life and key skills more relevant. This would build on PCS’s good practice in working successfully with a large travel agency to develop a realistic travel and tourism e-learning package based on its own systems.

p.2

The main area for further development is:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the provision. If there are any points you wish to discuss, please contact me. We gather information on the impact of our visits. To this end, you may be contacted by telephone or sent a questionnaire to complete six to 12 months after the visit. I hope you will contribute to this evaluation. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website and will be available to the team for your next inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion