Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jan Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jan Smith

  • Postcode verified

    DL1 1DR

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings32w0
  • What needs to improve89w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
120
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 8%What needs to improve 22%About the inspection 70%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms S Robinson Principal and Chief Executive Darlington College Central Park Haughton Road Darlington DL1 1DR

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 13 October 2009 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with senior staff, tutors and learners, two observations of literacy teaching, and supporting documentation provided by the college.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The college has good strategic links with the Ministry of Defence and schools to support the development of literacy programmes for a wide range of learners facing barriers to achievement. This includes very successful programmes for disaffected 14-16 year old learners and for new army recruits.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Very good contextualisation of literacy teaching helps to motivate learners and make literacy learning meaningful.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The college makes very effective use of initial and ongoing diagnostic assessment to set specific literacy targets for course and lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The balance in curriculum planning and delivery between the development of technical language skills, such as the correct use of punctuation and recognition of homophones, and the appropriate use of language to communicate for different purposes is good.  The varied and engaging teaching strategies, such as the use of games and mnemonics make learning fun and focus on small steps towards success.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The support for learners with dyslexia to develop strategies for independent learning is very effective.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 Teachers place a strong emphasis on improving learners’ capacity to learn independently by encouraging informed choice over the strategies and activities they use.

p.2

Areas for development

 We discussed the need to continue to develop with the army ways of embedding literacy and additional support within the 26 week army training, building on the initial assessment carried out at recruitment.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the college.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local learning and skills council and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion