Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Nov 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Harriet Harper

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Harriet Harper

  • Postcode verified

    KT1 2AQ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelysuccessfulsuccessfullyeffectiveclear
Criticismlimitedlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings324w+69
  • What needs to improve124w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
442
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 23, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%What needs to improve 28%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Dr N Sinnamon Principal Kingston College Kingston Hall Road Kingston upon Thames Surrey KT1 2AQ

p.1

women’s achievement

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, during my visit on 9 October 2009, to examine the causes of girls’ and young women’s underachievement and long-term economic well-being and the good practice that effectively supports them. The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national survey report. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

women’s achievement

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included discussions with staff; observation of part of two lessons; discussions with two groups of young women; and relevant documentation provided by the college.

p.1

women’s achievement

Overall, your work on promoting the achievement of young women and in developing their future economic well-being is satisfactory.

p.1

women’s achievement

The college has a traditional curriculum offer, with vocational areas that are either predominantly female or predominantly male. Attempts are made to challenge stereotypical choices through promotional materials, open days, enrichment activities and work with schools. Young women on engineering courses are particularly successful and those on childcare and beauty programmes develop good personal and employability skills, along with a clear understanding of expectations in the workplace.

p.1

Features of effective practice

 A small group of highly articulate and reflective young women on non- traditional courses, such as motor vehicle and aerospace engineering, who are particularly well-informed about the impact of career choice on future economic well-being.  Good support and guidance for pregnant teenagers and vulnerable young women, including for those who have been looked after, are unaccompanied asylum seekers or have physical disabilities, that enables the majority to successfully complete their studies.

p.1

Features of effective practice

 Effective support provided for disaffected girls through the pathway programme, designed for students in Years 10 and 11 who find it difficult to remain at school.

p.2

Areas for further improvement, which we discussed, include:

 low level of participation in college-wide enrichment activities by young women on traditionally female courses

p.2

Areas for further improvement, which we discussed, include:

 limited awareness by those young women on traditionally female courses of the financial impact of career choices on future economic well-being

p.2

Areas for further improvement, which we discussed, include:

 the recruitment of more young women on to traditionally male courses, building on the college’s success with adults, particularly in relation to the science foundation degree.

p.2

Areas for further improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to promote achievement and develop the economic well-being of young women.

p.2

Areas for further improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained, a copy of this letter will be sent to the local Learning and Skills Council and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion