Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Feb 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gina White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gina White

  • Postcode verified

    LS8 1ND

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Very positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelypositiveconsistentlygood progressconsistentenjoyproudconfident
Criticismtoo low

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings577w+68
  • Leadership163w+13
  • What needs to improve87w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
814
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%Leadership 20%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr N Clephan Headteacher Roundhay School Technology and Language College Gledhow Lane Leeds West Yorkshire LS8 1ND

p.1

technology (D&T)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 4 and 5 January 2010 to look at work in D&T.

p.1

technology (D&T)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on how the school promotes awareness and relevance of D&T to students and their parents, and the extent to which their views contribute to the school’s evaluation of D&T.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, parents and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of four lessons.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The overall effectiveness of D&T is good.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

 A consistent and improving trend of significantly above average attainment is established in D&T. Students enter the school with attainment in line with the national average. They make satisfactory progress during Key Stage 3 and reach expectations for their age, but few boys reach the higher levels. Extensive out-of-hours support for all students contributes effectively to their success in Key Stage 4 and post-16 examinations, closes the gap between some ethnic groups, and enables students to reach their targets and achieve slightly higher in D&T than they do in other subjects.  Students make mostly good progress in lessons, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities who receive good support and guidance. D&T makes a good contribution to students’ personal development. They enjoy and are proud of their work and are developing awareness of the moral and social responsibilities of designers and

p.1

Achievement in D&T

technologists. Students adopt safe and hygienic practices and, by the end of Year 9, are confident and able to make healthy meals.

p.2

Quality of teaching of D&T

 Teachers have good subject knowledge and use this effectively to develop resources and manage lessons and complex equipment safely. A wide range of teaching methods is adopted and engages students in learning.  Teachers’ use of their own work and examples from industry inspire students undertaking graphics and textiles courses. Seeing and discussing such examples deepen their understanding and help to demonstrate and raise expectations of professional quality.  Students know the next steps to take in their work and a consistent system of assessment and feedback is established. However, presentation of work tends to be over emphasised in teachers’ written comments.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

The quality of the curriculum in D&T is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

 The curriculum is inclusive and meets requirements well. Students are very positive about the guidance and support they receive to move to college courses or university. Provision ensures all students are actively involved in cooking and local health initiatives also engage families. The challenge of designing and making for clients would usefully benefit students and provide further opportunities to contribute to the positive work underway in the local community.  Schemes of work demonstrate a secure emphasis on sustainability and creativity and opportunities for students to use innovative materials are planned well. However, some projects in the Key Stage 3 curriculum are pitched too low and encourage repetition rather than challenge for every student.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

Leadership and management in D&T are good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

 Leadership ensures health and safety are covered well and monitored in the department. Staff apply professional development well to develop Key Stage 4 courses.  A diverse range of activities characterises the work of the department. However, the impact of this work and the difference it makes to students’ learning and achievement are not recorded well in the current self- evaluation or development plan. An exception to this is the recent well- considered plan for reviewing the implementation of the new assessment systems. Such strategic planning has led to a quick adoption and consistency of approach by staff.

p.2

of D&T to students and parents

Awareness and relevance of D&T to students and parents are good.

p.3

of D&T to students and parents

 Parents and students support and are aware of the vision for D&T. Parents value the professional quality of their children’s work. Opportunities for families to participate in food activities are valued by parents: they say they provide good value for money and meet their needs.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 strengthening procedures to quickly and consistently evaluate the impact of actions and decisions on students’ achievement  ensuring the Key Stage 3 curriculum consistently challenges all students to promote their progress.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion