Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Nov 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Hancock

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Hancock

  • Postcode verified

    NE10 8BA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+88Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectivelymake good progresshigh-qualityenjoysuccessfullyenjoymentpositive

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings387w+87
  • Leadership129w+54
  • What needs to improve48w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
554
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs C Haddock Acting Headteacher White Mere Community Primary School Sherburn Way Wardley Gateshead NE10 8BA

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 6 October 2009 to look at work in design and technology (D&T).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on how the school promotes awareness and relevance of D&T to pupils and their parents, and the extent to which their views contribute to the school’s evaluation of D&T.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of four lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – design and technology

The overall effectiveness of D&T is good.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

 Children make a good start to learning practical and creative skills in the Reception class. Achievement is good and pupils learn through an appropriate range of activities, for example making a coat for a toy rabbit and building a den.  Pupils make good progress in all aspects of designing and making as they move through the school and a significant proportion reach standards that are above expectations. Skills are applied well using specific contexts for D&T activities, such as designing and making musical instruments in Year 5. This results in all different groups of pupils, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, being able to produce creative products.  Pupils’ personal development is good. Attitudes to learning are characterised by sustained concentration when engaged in practical tasks and a strong determination to succeed. Pupils thoroughly enjoy D&T work, and particularly like developing their design ideas.

p.1

Quality of teaching of D&T

 Lessons are planned well to meet the needs and D&T capabilities of all the different groups of pupils. Teachers’ subject knowledge is secure and good use is made of appropriate resources to support pupils’ learning. All staff work closely and effectively as a team to move learning forward and individual help for pupils is a strong feature. High-quality questioning by teachers and support staff ensures pupils of all abilities are challenged to think and work creatively when designing.  Assessment information is used effectively to plan the next steps for learning and to evaluate pupils’ D&T capability. The school is aware more can be done to monitor individual progress in D&T more rigorously.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

The quality of the curriculum in D&T is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

 The curriculum meets children’s needs and interest well and is organised using national units of work together with other projects identified by the school. It is planned well with other subjects across the curriculum, for example, successfully integrating scientific knowledge of sound when designing musical instruments.  Pupils’ enjoyment of learning and the promotion of creativity are demonstrated well when they are engaged in practical work. The D&T curriculum is enhanced by after-school activities such as the ‘wrap around care’ and cooking clubs.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

The effectiveness of leadership and management is good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

 Pupils are achieving more in D&T as a result of significant recent improvement in the quality of leadership and management at all levels. Subject performance is evaluated accurately by the school and areas for development identified well.  Recent changes in the way D&T is delivered are improving standards of work for all groups of pupils. D&T is continuing to move forward and all leaders are working together to make sure change continues to have a positive impact on pupils’ achievement.

p.2

of D&T to pupils and parents

Pupils say they find the subject relevant and interesting. The school shares its vision and examples of D&T work with parents using subject and class portfolios. Parents’ views on shaping the D&T curriculum are represented through the parent governor.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 monitoring individual progress in D&T more rigorously.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion