Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Feb 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kathleen Tyler

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kathleen Tyler

  • Postcode verified

    MK42 9AH

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings27w0
  • What needs to improve113w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
138
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 78%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr I Pryce Principal Bedford College Cauldwell Street Bedford MK42 9AH

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – good practice in literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and learners, during my visit on 20 and 21 October 2009 to look at work in literacy. My work focused on the Bedford campus and did not include the Shuttleworth campus.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – good practice in literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – good practice in literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: five lesson observations; discussions with you, three members of your senior management team and the cross-college coordinator for literacy; discussions with three tutors; individual discussions with five learners and examination of some of your college documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The college gives a very high profile to teaching and learning in literacy and the organisational structure promotes the importance of all learners’ development of literacy skills very effectively. Managers and tutors have a good understanding of the barriers learners face in developing their literacy skills and of successful strategies to help learners overcome these barriers.  The college has successfully created learning opportunities in literacy for young people and adults across the college, in the community and in the workplace and provides literacy support on an individual basis and in groups. This is significant in helping learners overcome barriers in accessing literacy support.  Where appropriate, the college successfully encourages learners to achieve not only the minimum level of key skills award in communication that their substantive vocational or academic programme requires, but also to study at a higher level if they have the potential. This encourages

p.1

Features of good practice observed

learners to extend and to develop their skills. Learners’ achievement of national qualifications in literacy is high.  All full-time vocational programmes for learners aged 16 to 19 include specialist teaching and learning in literacy, which covers entry level to level 2. Additionally, all level 1 vocational programmes have a specialist literacy tutor in classes, working alongside the vocational tutor, to provide expert in-class support. The college also provides specialist dyslexia support. The learners I spoke to find that this extensive support in literacy is helping them to improve their literacy skills significantly.  In most vocational areas, tutors closely relate the literacy learning to the specific context of learners’ vocational areas of study. They make effective use of specialist vocabulary and appropriately contextualised learning resources. Learners I spoke to said this makes their literacy learning

p.2

Features of good practice observed

interesting and highly relevant.  In the best lessons I observed, tutors were very skilled at explaining specific literacy skills in ways which learners understood, with a very effective focus on the development of learners’ underpinning skills in literacy, including punctuation, spelling and grammar. Learners I spoke to said that they were making greater progress in the development of their literacy skills since starting at college than they had in many previous years of study.

p.2

Areas for development

 We discussed the need to ensure that the contextualised delivery of literacy skills for learners aged 16 to 19 is appropriately extended to all vocational areas of study and that this work is of a consistently high standard.  In addition, we discussed the need to further monitor the quality of teaching and learning in literacy, to ensure its consistency across all staff and for all learners.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the college. As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion