Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Kathleen Tyler
- Postcode verified
SY11 3JA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- We discussed the potential of bringing together the databases where learners’ information is recorded, to make access for staff more straightforward. p.2
- In addition, we discussed the need for greater consideration of the assessment of learners’ written skills in the vocational areas. p.2
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the college. p.2
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.2
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 113
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr D Kendall The Director Derwen College Oswestry Shropshire SY11 3JA
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – good practice in literacy
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and learners, during my visit on 14 October 2009 to look at work in literacy.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – good practice in literacy
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – good practice in literacy
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: two lesson observations; discussions with you and members of your senior management team; discussions with four curriculum managers, including the cross-college coordinator for literacy; discussions with five tutors; discussions with six learners and examination of some of your college documentation.
p.1
Features of good practice observed
The college provides extensive and very effective opportunities for learners in literacy, with a clear strategy in place and a well-established whole-college approach to literacy skills development. The organisational structure promotes the importance of the development of learners’ literacy skills particularly well. Managers and tutors have a very good understanding of the barriers learners face in developing their literacy skills and of successful strategies to help learners overcome these barriers. Staff are very clear that they all have a responsibility to develop learners’ literacy skills. All learners have individual, specific and very clear objectives for their literacy skills development, which they review regularly with their tutors. Both literacy tutors and vocational tutors make good use of a college-wide database to record learners’ progress. This clearly demonstrates that learners are making good progress in the development of their literacy
p.1
Features of good practice observed
skills. One learner I spoke to described how he can now read many more words and is able to write in full sentences. The combination of specialist literacy support for learners, as well as literacy skills development in their vocational study areas, is working very effectively. Specialist literacy tutors, as well as vocational tutors, have developed a good range of methods to support learners. They make good use of a wide range of strategies to meet individual learner needs, which includes the use of phonics. In addition, in all vocational areas, tutors display key vocabulary and phrases in words, in pictures and in symbols, to maximise and to reinforce learning. Learners further develop their literacy skills in real working environments. For example, in the lessons I observed, learners were reading, compiling and typing menus in the college restaurant and reading and typing stock lists in the catering area. In more informal settings, I observed learners
p.2
Features of good practice observed
confidently using information technology to read, write and send messages to families and friends.
p.2
Areas for development
We discussed the potential of bringing together the databases where learners’ information is recorded, to make access for staff more straightforward. In addition, we discussed the need for greater consideration of the assessment of learners’ written skills in the vocational areas.
p.2
Areas for development
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the college.
p.2
Areas for development
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion