Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Nov 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Karen Adriaanse

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Karen Adriaanse

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings28w0
  • What needs to improve96w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
123
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 22%About the inspection 72%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms M Mellor Principal Liverpool Community College Clarence Street Liverpool L3 5TP

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – good practice in literacy

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 6 October 2009 to look at work in literacy.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – good practice in literacy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – good practice in literacy

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included two lesson observations; discussions with you and two members of your senior management team; discussions with the cross-college coordinator for literacy and two tutors; individual discussions with four learners and examination of some of your college documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The college has successfully created foundation learning for adults and young people across the college. All courses for learners aged 16 to 18 from entry level to level 2 include teaching and learning in literacy. Courses in literacy form part of a wider programme of development for adults. Learners I spoke to find having clear long-term aims helps to motivate them to improve their literacy.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The very high profile given to foundation learning, including literacy and English, is now well established throughout the college. The organisational structure promotes the importance of all learners’ development of literacy skills very effectively.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The college uses only specialist literacy teachers to teach literacy, including on vocational courses. In the lessons I observed, the teachers were very skilled at explaining specific literacy skills, such as the use of capital letters, in different ways so that each learner could use the skill independently. Learners I spoke to said they were familiar with literacy conventions and parts of speech that had flummoxed them in the past.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The college has maintained the funding to run adult learning, including literacy in community centres. This is significant in helping adult learners overcome barriers to attending courses .

p.2

Areas for development

 We discussed the need to ensure more learning materials and activities to develop learners’ literacy skills are closely linked to the subject areas that make up learners’ wider programme at the college and to learners’ interests outside the college.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy learning in the college.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local learning and skills council and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion