Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
David Anstead
- Postcode verified
WR5 2XD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment5
“Teaching is consistently good and sometimes outstanding.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 826
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr S Devlin Principal Blessed Edward Oldcorne Catholic College Timberdine Avenue Worcester WR5 2XD
p.1
and communication technology (ICT)
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and students, during my visit on 1 and 2 February 2010 to look at work in ICT.
p.1
and communication technology (ICT)
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.
p.1
and communication technology (ICT)
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; observation of seven lessons; and a tour of the school conducted by students.
p.1
and communication technology (ICT)
The overall effectiveness of ICT is good.
p.1
Achievement in ICT
The school evaluates students’ ICT capabilities during their first few weeks in the school. This shows attainment on entry to be broadly average. Students make good progress during Key Stage 3 so that by the end of Year 9 standards are above average. Although examination results in 2009 were similar to those seen nationally, current Year 11 students have already attained above average results. The proportion attaining the merit and distinction grades is approximately double that seen nationally. This represents good achievement. Standards in programming are average and lag behind the higher standards students demonstrate in, for instance, page layout, editing audio and video, making animations, and creating their own spreadsheets and databases. Students have a good awareness of how to keep themselves safe when online and how to protect their personal and financial details. They are less sure about how to protect their personal technology from unwelcome
p.1
Achievement in ICT
intrusions. Students work well with each other in small groups and independently. Relationships and behaviour are good. Students say they enjoy ICT and look forward to their lessons. A teaching assistant working exclusively in ICT provides good support to students with English as an additional language and students with special needs and/or disabilities, enabling them to make the same good progress as their peers.
p.2
Quality of teaching in ICT
Teaching is consistently good and sometimes outstanding. Teachers explain clearly to students the kinds of outcomes they are expected to achieve, sometimes demonstrating this with exemplar materials. Lessons proceed at a fast pace. These factors, together with the regular and rigorous evaluations students make of the quality of their work against the assessment criteria, drive the good progress they make. Students are very clear about their current level of performance and what they need to do to improve their work. The use of assessment by ICT teachers is outstanding.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in ICT
The quality of the curriculum in ICT is good.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in ICT
There are good opportunities for students to develop their capabilities in using ICT to communicate and present their ideas and to manipulate data in spreadsheets and databases. Data-logging equipment is used in science by students to record and graph experimental changes. Students have good opportunities to develop their programming skills at Key Stage 3 with around half of them successfully writing programs using sub-routines by Year 9. However, this good start is not sustained at Key Stage 4. Although further opportunities are provided for all students to consolidate their programming skills, there are only opportunities for around a quarter of them to go on to higher level coding. Most students attain the equivalent of three GCSE qualifications in the time normally allocated for just one GCSE. This is a deliberate policy to ensure students encounter a breadth of ICT experiences without eating
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in ICT
into the time available for other subjects. The volume of work to be covered was challenging for staff and students at first which was why standards remained average in the first few years of its implementation.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management in ICT
The effectiveness of the leadership and management in ICT is good. There is a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the ICT department. Short- and long-term plans are in place to develop the areas identified as weaknesses. The strong upward trend in test results at both Key Stages 3 and 4 over the last two years demonstrates the good capacity to improve. Resources are managed well and, where possible, freeware solutions are developed at a greatly reduced cost. Good value for money is obtained from the investment in ICT.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
ensuring all students can build upon the good start they make in learning programming at Key Stage 3 by extending the provision for computing at Key Stage 4 developing the use of ICT so that it has a greater impact on improving the quality of learning in other subjects and raises attainment and improves achievement.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion