Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Christine Jones
- Postcode verified
GU52 7RY
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment12
“Teachers have high expectations of students’ behaviour and involvement in the lessons.” p.2Progress & outcomes5
“They make good progress from their starting points on entry to the school.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 830
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs B Stevens Headteacher Court Moor School Spring Woods Fleet Hampshire GU52 7RY
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Science
p.1
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 20 and 21 October 2009, to look at work in science.
p.1
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on evaluating the impact of recent initiatives and to investigate the need for future developments.
p.1
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.
p.1
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of seven lessons.
p.1
The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good.
p.1
Achievement in science
The GCSE results for five A* to C in science were above average in 2008 and have continued to improve in 2009. Information on students’ performance indicates that this rising trend in results is continuing as the new GCSE courses become firmly embedded into the science curriculum.
p.1
Achievement in science
Analysis of performance data for Key Stage 3 indicates that younger students are also reaching good standards. The quality of students’ learning and progress is good. They make good progress from their starting points on entry to the school.
p.1
Achievement in science
Students are keen to learn and most work hard in lessons, especially, where the subject material is engaging and interesting.
p.2
Achievement in science
Students behave well in lessons. They enjoy discussions, are keen to voice their opinions in a mature and sensible way and work together well in practical sessions.
p.2
Quality of teaching of science
The quality of teaching in science is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching of science
Teachers have good subject knowledge and use this well to make science lessons relevant and interesting to the students.
p.2
Quality of teaching of science
In the best lessons, teachers understand the need for students to be active participants. Teachers have high expectations of students’ behaviour and involvement in the lessons.
p.2
Quality of teaching of science
Where students’ independent learning and team-working skills are less well developed, teachers work hard to encourage students to work together and think about their individual contributions to the group.
p.2
Quality of teaching of science
Students particularly enjoy science practical work, especially, where they are given creative opportunities to explore their own ideas.
p.2
Quality of teaching of science
Information and communication technology (ICT) is used appropriately by both teachers and students to support teaching and learning.
p.2
Quality of teaching of science
Marking and assessment practices are inconsistent within the department. Too much marking gives only limited diagnostic feedback and students, especially younger ones, are unclear about the standards they are reaching in science and what they could do to improve.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in science
The science department is currently working on revising the Key Stage 3 curriculum with an emphasis on ‘how science works’. The department has not, as yet, developed a common approach to scientific enquiry that would give students a clear framework when working on investigations.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum in science
New GCSE courses have been introduced successfully. This has widened the options available to students that are more relevant and interesting. For example, students are really enjoying the coursework only BTEC science course as they find the subject material much more applicable to their everyday interests. A good range of extra-curricular activities support the science curriculum. Science clubs and extra revision sessions are well-attended as are the science lectures open to parents as well as students.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management in science
Leadership and management of science are good.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in science
The school is clearly determined to maintain the good standards in science and the senior leadership team provides a positive environment for innovation and improvement in this department.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in science
Monitoring systems give a good view of the quality and standards of science education. This information is used as a springboard for further developments in teaching and learning.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in science
Thorough monitoring of the performance of each student gives a clear view of individual achievement and is used effectively to identify those who are not achieving the best they can.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management in science
Teachers receive training that is appropriate to their needs from a variety of internal and external providers. In particular, the in-school ‘research and development’ meetings have set up a series of cross subject collaborative groups that are a good forum for developing and embedding improvements to teaching and learning.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
making sure that assessment strategies give students a clear understanding of the standard of their work and how this can be improved
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
agreeing a common approach to investigative science in Key Stage 3.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion