Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Aug 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Vic Chivers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Vic Chivers

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+77Very positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisewell plannedstrongenthusiasticeffectivepositiveprecisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings271w+75
  • What needs to improve69w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
329
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

primary schools

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 15 June 2009 to look at the Microsociety programme. The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

primary schools

The visit included discussions with yourself, staff and pupils and observation of two lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Well planned lessons that had good pace, engaged all pupils and were taught by highly enthusiastic teachers.  The development of pupils’ communication and presentation skills.  The effective way in which pupils collaborated and worked in various groupings and teams.  The good development of pupils’ understanding of democratic processes and their willingness to accept positive criticism and to modify their ideas accordingly.  Pupils’ good understanding of how currencies operate, their sense of the relative value of different products and services and how these can be exchanged and traded.  Pupils’ understanding of the factors that can influence business planning.  The ability of pupils to work productively within tight time constraints.  Pupils’ developing understanding of a range of jobs and responsibilities, including how different skills and aptitudes can contribute to the effectiveness of team working.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Features of good practice observed

Mrs S Tomes Headteacher Wimbledon Chase Primary School Merton Hall Road London SW19 3QB  The good opportunities provided to develop pupils’ recording skills.  The strong sense of social responsibility pupils are developing.

p.1

An area for development that we discussed was:

 identifying the intended learning outcomes more precisely and developing ways of tracking pupils’ progress in achieving these.

p.2

An area for development that we discussed was:

I hope these observations are useful for the future development of work in this area.

p.2

An area for development that we discussed was:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion