Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Aug 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adrian Lyons

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adrian Lyons

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+81Very positivemore positive than 83% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseextremelywell plannedhigh qualitystrongeffectivelyclearlytimely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings271w+81
  • What needs to improve85w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
348
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 29, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 24%

Full report text

primary schools

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and pupils, during our visit on 17 June 2009 to look at work in developing pupils’ economic well-being. The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

primary schools

The visit focused on the Microsociety project and included discussions with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation and visits to lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Highly engaged pupils who were clearly greatly enjoying the Microsociety activities.  Pupils were provided with extremely good opportunities to learn independently and to develop organisational, team-working and decision-making skills.  The provision of well focused and timely support to develop their learning.  Lesson activities that were well planned and very effectively developed pupils’ economic well-being and personal financial capability.  The high quality of pupils’ reflection on what they had learned and the skills they developed by taking part in the learning activities in both Years 5 and 6.  The strong commitment of senior managers and staff to the development of children’s economic well-being and personal financial capability through the implementation and evaluation of well- structured learning activities. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Features of good practice observed

15 July 2009 Mrs F Duffy Headteacher Dundonald Primary School Dundonald Rd Wimbledon London SW19 3QH  The good use made of visiting adults and pupils from other classes to give feedback and promote pupils’ skills in meeting the needs of others.

p.1

The area for development that we discussed, included:

 implementing the plans to fully prepare children for the Microsociety activities in Year 5 and providing further opportunities in Year 6 to extend their learning.

p.2

The area for development that we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop work to promote pupils’ future economic well-being in the school.

p.2

The area for development that we discussed, included:

As explained in our previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion