Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Feb 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Henry Moreton (lead), Gill Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gill Jones, Henry Moreton

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−74Very criticalmore positive than 3% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyhigh expectationsfeel safeconfidentrichenjoyconsistentlyconfidently
Criticisminadequateweaknessesnot robustnot clearfailspoorlyseriousfailure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1325w−61
  • Leadership341w−82
  • What needs to improve209w−79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,873
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Page 1 Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566930 Direct F 01695 729320

p.1

Mrs Horsley Farnworth CofE Controlled Primary School Pit Lane Widnes Cheshire WA8 9HS

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit with Henry Moreton, Additional Inspector, to your school on 08 – 09 December 2009, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in June 2009. The monitoring inspection report is attached and the main judgements are set out below.

p.1

Primary School

Progress since being subject to special measures – inadequate

p.1

Primary School

Newly Qualified Teachers may not be appointed.

p.1

Primary School

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Primary School

I am copying this letter and the monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, the Interim Executive Board and the Director of Children’s Services for Halton.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors observed the school’s work, visited 17 lessons, scrutinised documents and met with the acting headteacher, groups of pupils, parents, the vicar, representatives from the local authority and the Interim Executive Board.

p.2

Context

Significant changes to governance and staffing have occurred following the inspection in June 2009. The governing body was replaced on 1 st October 2009 by an Interim Executive Board. The headteacher remains absent from school. His post is currently filled by the deputy headteacher, who was appointed to the position of acting headteacher on the 1st October. An assistant headteacher has stepped up to cover the post of deputyhead teacher. Two teachers retired in July and one teacher has relocated. These posts are filled by two permanent and one temporary teacher. One teacher is absent on long term sick leave. This class is covered by temporary teachers; there have been six to date, and sometimes by a higher level teaching assistant. Two teaching assistants are absent on long term sick leave and their positions are covered by temporary agency staff.

p.2

Context

In September, most staff changed year groups. One teacher changed year group at October half term. In addition, many staff took on different and/or additional subject responsibilities.

p.2

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

In 2009, the standards attained by 11 year olds in the national assessment tests were average and lower than previously. Standards are in steady decline. Fewer pupils reach the higher Level 5 in English, mathematics and science than is found nationally. Many pupils make inadequate progress from their average to above average starting points. The standards reached by seven-year-olds were above the national average in reading and mathematics, but below the national average in writing. Again, this represents inadequate progress for many pupils who started school with levels at or above those typical of four and five-year-olds nationally.

p.2

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Currently, the school does not have a clear picture of how well pupils are progressing or whether there is improvement since the inspection in June. A new system for collating pupils' progress data has been introduced, but it is not used to Page 3 evaluate pupils’ progress effectively. In addition, some of the data in the system is based on inaccurate assessments of pupils’ levels. The work in pupils’ exercise books and the observation of lessons demonstrates that pupils are not making sufficient progress. There is a wide variation in the quality and quantity of work produced by pupils in parallel classes, particularly in Year 1 and Year 6. Frequently, work is not matched well to pupils’ abilities. In the minority of classes where teaching is good, satisfactory progress is being made towards pupils assessing their own work. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who are gifted and

p.2

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

talented continue to make unsatisfactory progress. Some highly articulate pupils say their work is ‘dull and far too easy’. Overall, pupils’ progress remains inadequate.

p.3

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

Progress since the last inspection on the areas for improvement:

p.3

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

 Ensure that pupils in Key Stage 2 make much better progress and

p.3

by:

- involving them much more in their own learning and assessment - using the information gained from tracking their progress far more effectively in order to provide pupils with work which is responsive to their needs and provides a suitable level of challenge – inadequate

p.3

Other relevant pupil outcomes

Pupils’ behaviour remains good. They cooperate well with each other. However, pupils continue to become de-motivated when bored, and this shows itself in low level unruliness, even in Year 1. Most pupils say they feel safe in school. However, many pupils expressed disquiet, in particular over the sudden postponement of the Christmas disco. There are very few opportunities for pupils to contribute generally to the community or around school and this aspect is now inadequate. For example, there are few opportunities for pupils of all ages to participate in sport or other physical activities. Clubs pupils enjoyed, such as German and Art Club no longer run. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development remains satisfactory.

p.3

The effectiveness of provision

Inspectors observed a range of teaching across the curriculum. The majority of lessons observed were of a satisfactory quality, a quarter were inadequate and a similar proportion, good. Some improvements to teaching and learning have been made. For example, inspectors saw fewer lessons which relied on worksheets and in most classrooms display is linked to what pupils’ are expected to learn. In addition, relationships between staff and pupils are mainly good. Where teaching was good, high expectations exist and the pupils take pride in their work. Teachers ensure pupils understand the task by using assessment tools, such as traffic lights and there is also evidence of some good marking. The pace in lessons is appropriate and pupils are confident learners. Page 4 Where teaching was satisfactory or weaker, pupils spend too much time on the carpet, inactive. Sometimes teacher’s explanations were confusing and pupils did not

p.3

The effectiveness of provision

understand what they had to achieve. Work was not well matched to pupils’ abilities and lacked challenge. On occasion, tasks were far too challenging, particularly for those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. For example, in a history lesson, some pupils told the inspector that they could not read the worksheet provided to learn about the view point of Boudicca and her allies. In some lessons, pupils completed all of their work on white boards, wiping it off before the teacher had the opportunity to assess how well they achieved the task.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

There has been some progress in writing a long-term and medium-term curricular plan, but it is unfinished and unwieldy. There is no robust whole-school curricular plan to address progress and key skills. The more detailed planning for mathematics and literacy is inconsistent across the school and within the parallel year classes. It does not always indicate what pupils of different ability are expected to achieve. Work is commencing on revising the weekly planning for mathematics and English, in part to alleviate staff workload and raise morale. This is too little, too late. The curriculum still fails to motivate pupils. There are too few opportunities to explore and experience a rich and varied curriculum. Pupils report that they enjoy visits and the activities resulting from them, but some pupils find the basic diet of English and mathematics dull. There are very few opportunities for pupils to participate in sport,

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

music or artistic experiences. Few clubs exist and those which do are not available to all pupils.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

Progress since the last inspection on the areas for improvement.

p.4

The effectiveness of provision

 Improve the quality of teaching and learning in Key Stage 2 by: - providing pupils with consistently challenging work - increasing the pace of lessons and setting much higher expectations for the amount and quality of work to be completed in lessons –

p.4

inadequate

 Improve the quality of the curriculum by: - producing a whole-school curricular plan that identifies how pupils will progressively acquire and apply key skills across different subjects - ensuring that planning fully matches pupils’ needs making it much more relevant and exciting for pupils – inadequate

p.4

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Senior leaders and managers demonstrate an awareness of the need to improve pupils’ achievement and standards. However, the senior leadership team are uncertain how to do this and consequently, progress is far too slow. Senior leaders have stepped up courageously to their new roles, but are ill-prepared to carry them out confidently. Their actions are sometimes ill-conceived and poorly communicated. The advice, guidance and support received from consultants is seriously weakened Page 5 by a lack of coherent monitoring and evaluation at all levels of leadership. Consequently, the capacity within the school to improve remains inadequate.

p.4

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Staff morale is very low, including for those holding posts of responsibility. Changes made to teachers’ year groups and responsibilities in September have resulted in some previously good departments being weakened. Many staff are not clear about how to improve their practice and shared concerns with inspectors. For some staff, in particular those who are new to the school, protocols for reading, handwriting and general classroom management are not clear. Teachers are aware of their accountability for the standards pupils achieve, but they are looking for support, clear direction and guidance in how to ensure pupils achieve their potential.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Safeguarding and community cohesion remains insecure. Training has been provided recently but this has not been disseminated to all staff. Actions which are agreed at a senior level are not carried out by all staff. As a result, the health, welfare and safety of pupils remain a concern.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

The new Interim Executive Board knows the strengths and weaknesses of the school. They are securing relevant information on a regular basis from the acting headteacher, but have not ensured that sufficiently robust systems exist to check its accuracy. Consequently, they have not acted with the urgency that is required to remedy some of the more serious weaknesses. Parents and pupils are frustrated by the failure of leadership to secure improvement, particularly with regard to the disruption in staffing, which is resulting in inequality of opportunity for pupils.

p.5

The effectiveness of leadership and management

Progress since the last inspection on the areas for improvement.

p.5

Improve the quality of leadership and management by:

- making leaders and managers at all levels more accountable and responsible for the progress made by pupils and the standards they achieve - including all staff more in school development planning, the analysis of assessment data and in checking on the effectiveness of provision - ensuring that statutory requirements with regard to safeguarding and community cohesion are fully met - enabling governors to acquire the necessary information and skills that will allow them to support and challenge the school’s performance effectively - inadequate

p.5

External support

The local authority has provided a satisfactory support to the school in line with its statement of action. Consultants and local authority officers have visited the school on a regular basis and personnel advice and additional financial support have been secured. In addition, the local authority formed the Interim Executive Board to Page 6 replace the governing body and a consultant headteacher has provided bespoke support to the acting headteacher. However, because the management of the school is not robust enough to carry through the advice and guidance provided with sufficient rigour, and the monitoring by the local authority is not incisive, the support has had a very limited impact.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

 To eradicate inadequate teaching and improve the quality of teaching across the whole school.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion