Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Jan 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alison Storey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alison Storey

  • Postcode verified

    RM12 5PP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
15
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%About the inspection 99%

Full report text

Mr Barry Read The R J Mitchell Primary School Tangmere Crescent Hornchurch Essex RM12 5PP

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 1 and 2 December 2009 and for the information which you provided before and during my visit. Please pass on my particular thanks to the staff I met formally or talked with, to your chair of governors, your school improvement partner and the group of pupils who met with me to share their perspectives of the school.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Since the last inspection pupil numbers have increased slightly. For the first time in recent years the Reception class is full and the number of pupils joining or leaving the school during the course of the year is falling. An additional teacher was appointed from the beginning of this term. This has allowed two senior managers to have regular time to fulfil their other responsibilities by sharing the teaching of a class. A number of staff have recently taken on new roles as key leaders and there have been several changes of governors over the past year.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

As a result of the inspection on 12 and 13 November 2008, the school was asked to:

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

 accelerate progress to raise standards in mathematics and science  ensure that all teaching is good or better by providing a consistently good level of challenge and independent learning opportunities for pupils of all abilities  make better use of assessment to inform day-to-day teaching and learning.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Standards reported at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage in 2009 were similar to those at the last inspection. Broadly speaking by the end of the Reception Year the large majority of children reach the expected level for their age. This is not Tribal Group 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T0117 311 5236 Direct F 0117 315 0430 alison.storey@ofsted.gov.uk Page 2 fully reflected in the picture at the end of Key Stage 1. Overall, standards at this point are not significantly different to those found nationally, but an improvement in mathematics in 2009 was countered by a drop in writing. In recent years the proportion of pupils reaching the higher levels in reading, writing and mathematics has fallen. This might be explained by the high mobility of pupils, but senior leaders are also aware that it raises questions about the accuracy of assessments across the

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

younger year groups which need to be investigated.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Through better use of data the school identified those pupils in Year 6 who were capable of reaching the higher levels in mathematics and science. By targeting support through activities such as booster groups their progress was accelerated. As a result, in both subjects in 2009 the proportion reaching Level 5 at the end of Key Stage 2 rose from a low baseline to over a third, with smaller increases in the proportion reaching Level 4. Overall, standards in both subjects were slightly above those found nationally, having been significantly below the previous year. At the same time, there has been a whole-school focus on developing the quality of mathematics and science provision to ensure more consistent progress over time and reduce the need for interventions. This has included reviewing what is taught and how, training for staff and, in mathematics, workshops for parents. The school does not yet have data to show the impact on standards and progress across the

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

school, but recent monitoring has shown an improvement in the teaching of mathematics and pupils reporting a greater enjoyment and understanding of their learning.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

The school acknowledges that the emphasis on mathematics and science had an adverse impact on standards in English at the end of Key Stage 2 last year, particularly for those pupils who had the potential to achieve Level 5. Senior leaders have accurately identified writing as a whole-school priority this year. They are confident that systems are now sufficiently established to address this while sustaining recent improvements. For example, the school is updating its tracking systems so that all pupils’ progress in English, mathematics and science will be checked more regularly. By doing this the school expects that from now on it will pick up and address any underachievement sooner rather than later.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Training for staff and regular, focused monitoring and feedback are improving the quality of teaching, such that over half of lessons observed over the last six months have been good or better. There is evidence of a shift from teachers talking to pupils engaged in activities and discussions. Pupils are particularly positive about those lessons that take a topic approach to make meaningful links between subjects. Regular assessments are now established, even though there is still a perceived need for tests to confirm the accuracy of teachers’ assessments. Most teachers are differentiating work to match the different needs and abilities in their classes and evaluating how successful their lessons are. However, there is more to be done to ensure that they are evaluating the learning that has taken place. Increasingly, pupils are involved in assessing their own learning and termly learning conferences

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

provide time for teachers, pupils and their parents to review progress and set goals Page 3 together. Regular achievement team meetings involve all staff in finding solutions to individual pupils’ barriers to learning, while the pupil and family support meetings take a holistic approach to supporting more vulnerable pupils. In particular this has had a marked impact on reducing the number of poor attenders.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Senior leaders and governors are ambitious for the school. They are determined to achieve and sustain high quality through embedding good practice rather than quick fixes. They appreciate that some systems still need refining and recognise that ultimately the success of their work will be measured by the progress that pupils make. Staff understand what the school is trying to achieve and are increasingly taking on responsibilities for leading improvement, while governors are well aware of their responsibilities to challenge as well as support. The local authority has not worked closely with the school because senior leaders have chosen to use external consultants. The support from the school improvement partner has been valued, but reports do not always present an accurate picture of the school.

p.3

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion