Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Jun 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tony Gallagher

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tony Gallagher

  • Postcode verified

    WV13 1PX

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−23Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfullypositive
Criticismpoorlimitednot positivelower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
506
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr D Bucknall Operations Manager Nova Training 3 Lower Lichfield Street Willenhall WV13 1PX

p.1

citizenship education

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 22 June 2009 to look at work in citizenship education.

p.1

citizenship education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

citizenship education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included observations of lessons, discussions with students and staff and scrutiny of documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Nova successfully integrates citizenship learning within its work across all of its five centres. It is viewed as an essential element of the E2E programme along with work skills and skills for independence.  Citizenship education generally meets the needs of learners, many of whom had not previously enjoyed a positive experience in formal education. The citizenship perspective has enabled Nova to focus on some of the issues and obstacles faced by learners including attitudes and motivation. There is a solid foundation in place on which to build.  There are good examples of learner engagement including the community project ‘what it’s like to live here’ which enabled learners to meet with older people in a care home to share perspectives across generations. The focus on community and neighbourhood more generally encourages discussions about attitudes, views and personal motivation and helps learners develop a more positive outlook on the

p.1

Features of good practice observed

future.  Learners interviewed by inspectors saw the relevance of citizenship education to their day to day lives.  There is dedicated citizenship time in the programme; tutors meet regularly to share ideas and materials. Programme leaders have forged good working relationships with other post-16 citizenship providers in the region.  Good attention is given to quality issues such as lesson planning, programme review and staff networking. Tutors are self critical and receptive to advice and support.  Learners’ experiences and recollection of citizenship education from school is minimal, in part reflecting a poor school attendance pattern for many.  Resources and teaching materials are good. They are well organised and their presentation assists tutors in delivering citizenship learning. There is however some confusion within documentation and in lesson plans in relation to citizenship content, concepts and processes.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

Greater clarity about such issues and about principles underpinning citizenship would further assist teaching and learning.  Assessment is linked largely to evidencing Key Skills, the acquisition of personal and communication skills, improvements in attendance and in attitude. The nature and depth of assessment is limited by virtue of the 22 week programme, but scope exists to further develop approaches to assessment.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop post 16 citizenship.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LSC and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion