Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Asyia Kazmi
- Postcode verified
HA5 5RP
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 377
- shorter than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr H Freed Headteacher Nower Hill High School George V Avenue Pinner HA5 5RP
p.1
and effectiveness
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 14 May 2009 to look at the work that you are doing to develop and sustain high quality leadership in your school and your partner school.
p.1
and effectiveness
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
and effectiveness
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with staff and students; scrutiny of documentation; a number of lesson observations. In addition, evidence was also used from my visit on 19 May to one of your partner schools.
p.1
Features of good practice observed
The school’s work to develop the skills and effectiveness of leaders is outstanding. Staff across the school share your vision and speak very highly about the time you invest in their development. The identification and development of future leaders is impressive. Well planned training for middle managers and aspiring senior leaders benefit staff, including those from local schools. Flexibility between responsibilities helps middle leaders build up a wide range of experience, skills and knowledge. Staff acknowledge the challenge opportunities present but feel enthused by the support they receive. Students are encouraged to develop their own leadership skills and levels of participation in such activities are high. Students report that these opportunities develop their confidence, character and life skills. There is a commendable commitment to developing leadership capacity in other schools. You offer a range of very helpful support to your partner
p.1
Features of good practice observed
schools, including seconding staff to key positions when necessary. Staff in your school and in the partner schools are very positive about the impact of this work on their own professional development.
p.2
Features of good practice observed
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your work in this area.
p.2
Features of good practice observed
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion