Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Jul 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Asyia Kazmi

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Asyia Kazmi

  • Postcode verified

    E17 9RZ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingpositiveeffectivehigh qualitystrongrobustnurturingeffectively
Criticismnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings450w+85
  • What needs to improve87w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
529
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
6
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 16%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms R Macfarlane Headteacher Walthamstow School for Girls Church Hill Walthamstow London E17 9RZ

p.1

and effectiveness

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 12 May 2009 to look at the work that you are doing to develop and sustain high quality leadership in your school and your partner school.

p.1

and effectiveness

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and effectiveness

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with a range of staff and with students; scrutiny of documentation; a number of lesson observations. In addition, evidence was also used from my visit on 13 May to your partner school.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The school’s work to develop the skills and effectiveness of leaders is outstanding. The strong emphasis you place on this work permeates the school.  The robust performance management system, informed by the school improvement plan and the school aims, ensures that all staff have a common sense of purpose and direction.  You have created a culture where staff are empowered to take risks in a managed way. They speak very highly of the opportunities they have to take on responsibilities and the confidence of senior leaders in their ability to meet new challenges. Of particular note is the positive impact of senior leaders recognising and nurturing talents in staff which they had not yet recognised in themselves.  A key feature of your work to develop leadership is the support given to staff to enable them to lead in areas unfamiliar to them. For example, through joint planning and in-class support by senior leaders, teachers

p.1

Features of good practice observed

have delivered new courses outside their areas of specialism.  Staff speak very highly about leadership programmes such as those for aspiring middle and senior leaders. These enable them to have an informed perspective on the next step up as well as equipping them with the key skills necessary to effectively fulfil their current roles. Opportunities to shadow senior leaders further add to the menu of training available to develop leaders.  Your work in ensuring staff understand how effective leaders develop people and how effective teams communicate ensures there is a common understanding and a common language. This contributes to the positive ethos and culture evident amongst staff in the school.  Staff at your partner schools value the work with your school because they see it as an opportunity for practitioners to learn from each other.

p.2

Areas for development

 Students have a range of opportunities to develop their leadership skills. Particularly commendable is their work on the equality focus group. However, staff are working on developing students’ strategic role across the school further.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your work in this area.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion