Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Tanya Harber Stuart
- Postcode verified
CA4 0PA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They feel safe in school and staff are confident about what they need to do to ensure that the pupils continue to feel safe. p.2
- However the pupils stated that although they did feel safe at home they felt more safe in school because of the knowledge their teachers have about how to keep them safe when using new technologies. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop e-safety in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development4
“The training has had a positive impact on the outcomes for pupils.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 592
- shorter than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 61, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Ms S Stainton Headteacher Ivegill CofE School Ivegill Carlisle Cumbria CA4 0PA
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – E-safety
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 16 June 2009 to look at work in e-safety.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – E-safety
As outlined in my initial letter, this visit looked at: the extent to which schools teach learners to adopt safe and responsible practices in using new technologies e-safety training for staff.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – E-safety
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – E-safety
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and a tour of the school by pupils.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – E-safety
The overall effectiveness of e-safety was judged to be good.
p.1
Outcomes for learners
The pupils are safe in school, and they feel safe, in school when they are using new technologies. This is because of the good teaching they receive about how they can keep themselves safe. The pupils have a good knowledge and understanding of what they need to do to keep safe when they are using new technologies. The knowledge and understanding they have is age related with the older pupils very aware of some of the dangers they may face when using new technologies. Equally the pupils are confident about using new technology and have a responsible attitude when they do so. However the pupils stated that although they did feel safe at home they felt more safe in school because of the knowledge their teachers have about how to keep them safe when using new technologies.
p.1
Quality of provision
The quality of the provision provided is good.
p.2
Quality of provision
The curriculum provided ensures that the pupils, from the Early Years Foundation Stage to Year 6 are aware of the need to stay safe when using new technologies. The curriculum is based on the needs and interests of the pupils and they were able to talk about the work they had completed on e-safety. Year 1 and Year 2 were particularly aware of how some people might pretend to be other people on the internet, this knowledge and understanding came from a lesson based on a crocodile pretending to be a rabbit. The lessons on e-safety are reinforced each time the pupils use the internet. The lessons are enhanced through the Staying Safe Week, assemblies and links with the police.
p.2
Leadership and management
You have in place acceptable user policies for staff, parents and pupils. Everyone in the school has signed up to these rules and they follow them whenever they are using new technologies. There is also an e- safety policy. All of these policies have been agreed with the governors. All staff, and pupils, spoken to in the school were fully aware of the policies and procedures in place. They also knew why the policies and procedures were in place and what to do if anything went wrong. You have worked with some parents to enhance their awareness of e- safety issues. However you recognise that this is an area which you need to develop.
p.2
Quality of training
The quality of the training is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of training
All staff are trained in e-safety. However the training has tended to be ad hoc and is not based on a staff audit. This means that it is not always based on the needs and interests of the members of staff. The training has had a positive impact on the outcomes for pupils. They feel safe in school and staff are confident about what they need to do to ensure that the pupils continue to feel safe.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
working with parents to extend their knowledge and understanding of new technologies to ensure that the pupils feel as safe at home as they do in school putting in place a comprehensive and planned training programme which meets the needs and interests of all the staff.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop e-safety in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion