Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Jones

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christine Jones

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 73% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongwell plannedpositiveoutstandingsuccessfulimprovedenthusiasticenjoy
Criticismnot alwayslowernot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

About the inspectionFindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings586w+66
  • Leadership123w+73
  • What needs to improve91w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
775
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 13%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: science

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff when I visited the school on 3-4 June 2009 to look at work in science.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: science

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: science

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of parts of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2009-10 subject survey inspection programme: science

The overall effectiveness of science was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Overall standards are well above the national average and achievement is good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Achievement has improved steadily over the past two years as the science teaching has focused more closely on tracking achievement and raising attainment.  Results in 2008 were above national levels both at GCSE and Key Stage 3 and above the targets set by the department. Three quarters of pupils gained GCSE A* - C with almost a quarter gaining the highest A/A* grades.  Information provided by the school shows that this improvement is set to continue in 2009.  Students show very good attitudes to learning overall. They are keen and enthusiastic scientists who enjoy lessons that are practically based with plenty of opportunities for them to develop their skills through investigating and finding out. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Achievement and standards

Mr I Jungius Headteacher Willingdon Community School Broad Road Lower Willingdon Eastbourne East Sussex BN20 9QX  Students know how well they are doing and what they need to do to improve. They give very positive views of the assessment systems in place and how it helps their learning.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of science

The overall quality of teaching and learning in science is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of science

 All lessons observed were at least good with some outstanding elements.  Lessons are well planned and are supported by a detailed scheme of work covering skill as well as knowledge development.  Students experience a wide range of learning activities and they value the opportunity to study relevant science and to discuss science issues. They have a mature and sensible approach to this type of science teaching.  Assessment arrangements are secure and systematic, producing performance data that are accessible to all teachers and which are interrogated thoroughly to check on progress.  Students have very positive views of the quality of teaching they receive in science. They feel that science is a good department where lessons are ‘not too stuffy and you can ask questions.’  The quality and quantity of marking varies across the department with the best giving detailed and in depth feedback involving students in

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of science

reflecting on their standards through teachers’ written formative comment. In other cases books are rarely marked where teachers rely on more formal assessments to give feedback to students.  Older students appreciate the strategy that allows them to use their work books to make their own notes as this encourages them as independent learners.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 There is a good range of courses in Year 10 and 11 that meets the needs of all students. Students speak positively of the help and guidance they receive in choosing courses and of the teaching they receive from their specialist teachers. The number of students taking all three separate sciences is increasing. These successful courses are now all being taught in scheduled time rather than being added on outside of curriculum time.  Assessment strategies are being thoroughly embedded into the curriculum and teaching strategies. This is successful in keeping students focused on the level of their work as well as providing data for close tracking of their performance.  The Key Stage 3 curriculum overall is well planned to include learning and skills objectives alongside personal learning and thinking skills. The latter are not always clearly defined in individual lesson plans.  Students said they would like more ‘outside science’. There is little

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

extra curricular enrichment taking place in science although plans are in place to reintroduce activities such as CREST awards.

p.2

Leadership and management of science

Leadership and management in science are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of science

 Science is well managed in the context of a school where accountability is clear and there is strong senior leadership support. This has helped the department through some difficult staffing issues and led to the establishment of the current strong team.  The work of the department is thoroughly evaluated and reviewed using thorough data analysis. This provides a strong basis for further development.  The good quality tracking and assessment systems underpin the efforts of teachers to promote learning and raise attainment.  There is good collaboration between teachers in developing the curriculum, producing schemes of work and generating good quality learning materials. Students appreciate the good displays, especially where their work is included.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensuring greater consistency in marking of students’ work to give them feedback on their successes and what they need to do to improve  strengthening the provision for science outside of curriculum time.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science and music in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion