Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tim Bristow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tim Bristow

  • Postcode verified

    NG34 8JS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+86Very positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingsuccessfullyenjoystrengthvery welleffectivelyconsistently
Criticismnot sufficientlyvariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings605w+80
  • Leadership156w+77
  • What needs to improve102w+69

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
847
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%Leadership 16%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Mrs R Shaw Headteacher The Leasingham St Andrew’s CofE Primary School Lincoln Road Leasingham Sleaford Lincolnshire NG34 8JS

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 02 July 2009 to look at work in Design and Technology (D&T).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: observations of six lessons, discussions with groups of pupils, interviews with teachers, scrutiny of pupils’ work and the analysis of relevant school documents.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The overall effectiveness of D&T was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards overall are good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Children in the Reception class make a good start to the development of their D&T skills. They are encouraged to use their own ideas and demonstrate good perseverance when learning difficult skills. For example, children were trying hard to use split pins to create moving parts to a picture.  In Key Stages 1 and 2 pupils’ progress is good and by the end of Year 6 the standards they reach are above the expectations for their age. Important aspects of these high standards are the well-developed skills of design and evaluation that they demonstrate. For example, the work in Year 4 on pop-up mummification books showed that pupils had researched, investigated techniques to solve problems, created Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk prototypes and regularly modified their designs before embarking on the finished products, which were of a very high standard.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 In D&T lessons pupils demonstrate that they have excellent behaviour and attitudes to their work. They are encouraged to be creative and independent which they really appreciate and because of this they thoroughly enjoy D&T lessons. As one pupil reported ‘I enjoy everything to do with D&T it is so amazing.’

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

The quality of teaching and learning overall are good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

 Overall, teaching is good, but there are some outstanding elements. For example, in some lessons teachers use questioning skills expertly to help pupils to evaluate their work or to solve problems. Another strength of the teaching is the responsibility given to pupils to use their own ideas when devising their products and then to select from a very wide range of materials. Teachers carefully guide pupils in their work so as not to undermine their creativity and independence.  Teaching assistants work very well with pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities so that they are able to fully access the D&T lessons. They do this very sensitively and skilfully enabling pupils to use their own ideas and skills which fosters their self esteem and confidence.  Assessment procedures are used conscientiously to evaluate the quality of the pupils’ work. They are not used sufficiently to plan work

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

for a few pupils as they do not specifically match their needs. For example, some able pupils are not sufficiently challenged to enable them to produce work of a higher standard.  Self-evaluation procedures and personal targets are used very effectively so that pupils demonstrate that they understand the next steps they need to take in D&T lessons to improve their work.

p.2

Quality of the D&T curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the D&T curriculum

 The school has developed a highly innovative curriculum in which D&T plays an important part.  A major strength is the cross-curricular links that are established with other subjects. These benefit pupils in a number of ways. They very successfully motivate and engage pupils in projects that they perceive as meaningful and are related to other subjects and aspects of their work. For example, Year 5 pupils are thoroughly enjoying creating Victorian vehicles linked to their history work. This topic demands very accurate measuring.  The school offers a good range of visits, after-school clubs, visitors and skilled volunteers to enrich the pupils’ experience of D&T activities.  Pupils’ good information and communication technology (ICT) skills are well used particularly in the investigation and design stages of their work. For example, the Year 5 pupils’ imaginative ‘Spore project’. Bright and attractive displays celebrate the high quality of pupils’ D&T

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

Leadership and management of the subject are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of D&T

 Teachers have successfully ensured that the quality of provision and achievement remains high even though they are experiencing some changes in leadership.  The subject coordinator has ensured high standards by moderating and evaluating pupils’ work and teachers’ assessments. In addition she has led curriculum initiatives and the development of assessment procedures that are used consistently in all lessons. However, few opportunities are provided to evaluate the learning in lessons or to share the excellent practice that exists in the school, which explains the variation in the quality of some teaching.

p.3

of D&T to pupils, parents and carers

 School leaders have successfully established a shared appreciation amongst pupils, parents and staff of the importance of D&T to pupils’ education and well-being. As one parent reports: ‘The school seems very supportive of hands on learning and allows children to use their natural flair and their passion to build their skills on a regular basis.’

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 using assessment information more effectively when planning lessons to ensure it meets the needs of all groups of pupils and challenges the more able to raise their standards further  improving teaching so that it is consistently outstanding by sharing the best practice that exists in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school. As explained in the previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion