Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Subject Adviser (lead), Gina White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gina White, Subject Adviser

  • Postcode verified

    ME16 0LB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellenjoyhigh expectationsclearenthusiasticpositivekeenclearly
Criticisminsufficientlylimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings390w+61
  • Leadership167w+71
  • What needs to improve96w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
639
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Mr D Bray Headteacher St Francis Catholic Primary School Queens Road Maidstone Kent ME16 0LB

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 13 May 2009 to look at work in Design and Technology (D&T).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with you, the subject leader for D&T, staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The overall effectiveness of D&T was judged to be satisfactory and improving.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards overall are satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Most pupils achieve standards expected for their age by the end of Year 6. They develop practical skills well and know how to sew, cut and join materials. Their knowledge and understanding of specialist terms develops well in the middle years of Key Stage 2. However, standards and pupils’ progress in D&T varies significantly between classes and year groups.  D&T makes a good contribution to pupils’ personal development. They enjoy designing and making products and this promotes their confidence and self-esteem. Some pupils say they often surprise themselves about the things they can do such as making mechanisms to make toys and monsters move. Pupils apply safety rules very well in lessons and some older pupils are beginning to consider safety when designing their products. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory overall.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

 Pupils are enthusiastic in lessons and understand tasks: they enjoy the opportunities to discuss their ideas with each other. In all lessons a wide range of resources are used well to analyse products and support making.  Where teaching is good tasks are modelled well for pupils and they respond to encouragement to use their own ideas. Teachers have high expectations of pupils writing in D&T. When writing evaluations pupils apply strategies very well, including using their spellings books and sounding out words, to help them.  The content of planning is clear but teachers’ knowledge and understanding of progression is insufficiently developed to ensure all groups of pupils, particularly able pupils, make sufficient progress in lessons and in all aspects of designing.  Assessment of pupils D&T capability is at very early stages throughout the school. Pupils are unsure about how well they are doing or what their

p.2

Quality of the D&T curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the D&T curriculum

 The curriculum meets requirements although opportunities for pupils to cook are limited at Key Stage 2. Opportunities to use and learn about mechanisms and materials are embedded in schemes of work throughout the school.  The curriculum is enriched by specialists and events throughout the year and pupils are well motivated by competitions and keen to participate in them.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

Leadership and management of the subject are satisfactory.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

 The impact of leadership and management is well demonstrated in the provision of good resources and in a clear vision for D&T. This is appropriately focused upon preparing pupils for a changing technological future and using designing and making skills to improve the quality of life.  The new co-ordinator has made a positive start and has a good overview of D&T. As a result the development plan clearly identifies the key areas the school needs to tackle next to develop and strengthen practice in monitoring and evaluating and in the school’s assessment processes for D&T.  Health and safety is an integral feature of lessons and are applied very well by pupils.

p.2

of D&T to pupils and parents and carers

 The school has a clear vision for D&T. Pupils see the relevance of D&T to future careers and the school acts on their views. However there are few opportunities for pupils to use designing and making to improve the quality of life for others.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 developing teachers’ knowledge and understanding of D&T to improve the progress more able pupils make in lessons  ensuring assessment is consistent across the teaching team and pupils understand how well they are doing and what they need to do to improve.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As explained in the previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion