Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Jul 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michael Maddison

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michael Maddison

  • Postcode verified

    YO8 5AA

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+88Very positivemore positive than 97% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseenjoystrongeffectivelyenthusiastichigh expectationsmake good progresswell plannedconfidently
Criticismunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings646w+82
  • Leadership327w+83
  • What needs to improve96w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,042
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 27%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs P Dyson Barlby Bridge Community Primary School Thomas Street Barlby Road Barlby Bridge Selby North Yorkshire YO8 5AA

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 05 June 2009 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the contribution of history to community cohesion and the development of independent learning in history.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, a scrutiny of relevant documentation, an analysis of pupils’ work and the observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The overall effectiveness of history was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement is good and standards are average.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils make good progress in developing their historical knowledge and understanding. Pupils in Year 4, for example, know a great deal about the Ancient Egyptians, and those in Year 6 can talk confidently and fluently about Britain since 1948.  Pupils are developing good research and enquiry skills. They have the opportunity to look at a range of evidence, including artefacts. Pupils in Year 4, for example, particularly enjoyed having to explain the importance of a range of items in a Victorian version of the television programme, ‘Dragons Den’.  Pupils can make appropriate inferences from sources. Those in Year 2, for example, could not only describe what they could see in a picture of Mary Seacole and injured soldiers in the Crimea but they could also point to what this suggested.  Pupils’ chronological understanding is well developed. For example, pupils in Year 1 were seen correctly sequencing photographs of seaside

p.1

Achievement and standards

holidays from the 1950s to the present day and explaining the reasons for their choices.  History makes a good contribution to pupils’ personal development. Pupils are well motivated and enthusiastic about their learning. They work well individually, in pairs and in groups. They say they enjoy history because ‘it is fun’ and because ‘we always learn new information which helps us work things out’.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers have good subject knowledge, enjoy teaching history and teach the subject with enthusiasm.  Lessons are well planned and have pace which helps to keep pupils well focused on their learning. Teachers have realistically high expectations.  Teachers use a range of activities, including role play, to engage pupils and keep them motivated. Pupils are encouraged to ask questions, to seek out answers and to use the information to produce accurate explanations.  Learning is well matched to pupils’ needs. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are well supported in lessons by adults and through specific tasks. The needs of more able pupils are also well met through activities which engage and challenge them.  Work is carefully marked. Praise is given and helpful comments are made. However, the guidance given is rather general and does not include sufficient subject-specific comments.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Pupils’ achievement is assessed and recorded. However, the school is aware that the criteria for judging performance in each history topic are unclear.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The curriculum is broad, balanced and meets requirements. Apart from the spring term in Year 6, pupils benefit from undertaking some work in history in each term in both key stages.  For the last two years, history has been taught within an integrated structure which links subjects to themes. The school is coming to the end of the first cycle of this rolling two-year curriculum and both teachers and pupils say how much they enjoy this approach. The school is aware of the importance of undertaking an evaluation of the effectiveness of this approach and to ensuring that history retains its integrity within the curriculum.  Cross-curricular links are strong and help to support pupils’ learning. Literacy, for example, is developed effectively in history in all year groups, and opportunities are taken to link with other subjects, including art, drama, geography, and design and technology.  Learning outside the classroom makes a significant contribution to the

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

interest and engagement of pupils, and most school visits have a history focus. Pupils say how much they enjoy these activities and how they make their learning more interesting. Pupils also enjoy spending time immersed in the period which they are studying, as in the case of Year 4 and the Victorian day.

p.3

Leadership and management

The leadership and management of history are good.

p.3

Leadership and management

 The subject coordinator, who also has responsibility for art, and design and technology, is enthusiastic about her role. She works hard and her commitment is much appreciated by her colleagues.  The subject is well organised and planning is thorough. The coordinator has a good understanding of the strengths of the subject and the areas for further development.  The work of the coordinator in monitoring planning is well established. However, her role in evaluating the effectiveness of history across the school is not fully developed.

p.3

Subject issue: the contribution of history to community cohesion

The contribution of history to community cohesion is good.

p.3

Subject issue: the contribution of history to community cohesion

 History makes a strong contribution to developing pupils’ awareness of the community around them. This is achieved through incorporating local history into curriculum topics and through visits to local places of historical interest.  Pupils are taught about Britain’s cultural and ethnic heritage through, for example, studying the lives of Mary Seacole in the Crimean War and of Walter Tull, one of the first black footballers.  Pupils’ global awareness is being developed through the study of such topics as Ancient Egypt. Their understanding of recent migration is being strengthened through work on Polish culture and history.  Relationships are positive, and displays, assemblies and video and photographic records celebrate pupils’ achievements.

p.3

Subject issue: the development of independent learning in history

The development of independent learning in history is good.

p.3

Subject issue: the development of independent learning in history

 Independent learning is effectively developed through pupils being asked at the start of each topic what they know and what they want to know. Their ideas are incorporated into the teachers’ planning, enabling pupils to become more involved in taking responsibility for their own learning.  Pupils work well individually or in small groups. They focus on the tasks set, maintain their concentration well and say how much they enjoy finding things out for themselves.  Pupils are often set research activities and they enjoy using computers for this purpose and for recording their findings in, for example, PowerPoint presentations.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 consolidating assessment practice and developing marking so that pupils receive sufficient subject-specific comments on how to improve  consolidating the role of the subject coordinator so that she is able to monitor and evaluate history across the school more effectively.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion