Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bob Hamp

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bob Hamp

  • Postcode verified

    CV32 5JE

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings34w0
  • What needs to improve62w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
95
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 8%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 77%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

24 September 2008 Ms S Fleming Vice Principal Warwickshire College Warwick New Road Leamington Spa Warwickshire CV32 5JE

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 22 September 2008 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of learners’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The principal, senior managers and governors have a very clear understanding of the importance of the user voice in maintaining and improving the college’s outstanding provision  Comprehensive use of the citizenship syllabus throughout the college to provide learners with the skills, knowledge and activities to have their ‘voice’ heard and to be involved in active citizenship projects  Comprehensive student representation structure, open to full and part-time learners, which provides its elected members with training to participate effectively at relevant college forums and meetings  The use of feedback, provided by learners, on the quality of their teaching and learning, which is utilised at programme reviews, self assessment and for staff appraisals  Well developed formal and informal culture of openness and support which allows students to voice their opinions and views directly to college staff, including the

p.1

Features of good practice observed

college principal  Wide range of learner involvement in college projects from design and location of student services to participation in the design phase of the new building programme at the Pershore campus  Good use of student surveys, at each stage of the learners’ journey, and questionnaires, to help review, evaluate and improve provision in response to student feedback  Wide variety of user voice initiatives, for example, recognition of time and effort given by learners to local voluntary work and work of student representatives through National V scheme.

p.1

Areas for development

 Continue to establish systems for measuring the impact of the learner voice initiatives within the college.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in the college.

p.2

Areas for development

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion