Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Jun 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tony Noonan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tony Noonan

  • Postcode verified

    SW4 9BL

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectivestrongsafe
Criticismseriously

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
294
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms R Nixon Vice Principal Lambeth College 45 Clapham Common South Side London SW4 9BL

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my recent visit. I am grateful to you and all your colleagues for their work in preparing for the visit and for giving up time during the visit to meet me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned, including the principal, and of course the learners and staff that met with me. The visit provided much useful evidence for the further development of community cohesion. I noted, in particular:

p.1

Areas of good practice identified:

 The safe, harmonious and highly inclusive college ethos  The strong focus on developing employability skills to improve the employment prospects of learners  The highly effective multi-agency collaboration that improves the opportunities of vulnerable groups  The good understanding among staff of the needs of the local community, including employers  The broad range of English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) programmes, offered at suitable times and locations, that enhances the integration and citizenship of large numbers of learners  Learners are well represented in the college and staff take their views seriously and act upon them appropriately.

p.1

Point for consideration identified:

 Some adult learners feel that enrichment activities should be more readily available to them.

p.1

Point for consideration identified:

The published survey report will list the names of the contributing institutions in an appendix. Should we wish to cite specific aspects of the good practice observed on this visit in the form of a detailed case study, you will be contacted first. You will be notified of the date of publication of the survey report when it is confirmed and you will be provided with details of any other arrangements to disseminate the survey’s findings.

p.1

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion