Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Jun 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Fred Brown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Fred Brown

  • Postcode verified

    BD7 1AY

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongsensitivesafe

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
272
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms Michele Sutton Principal Bradford College Great Horton Road Bradford BD7 1AY

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my recent visit. I am particularly grateful to you and your staff for the hard work involved in preparing for the visit and for giving up your time to meet me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned, including your students.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

The visit provided much useful evidence for the further development of community cohesion. We noted, in particular:

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 Very strong leadership and support for community cohesion throughout the College  Good opportunities to promote shared values and open debate of sensitive and controversial issues  Very good initiatives to promote the engagement and success of harder to reach groups  Good development of learner communication and advocacy skills through voice and influence activities  Very strong promotion of a safe and healthy learning environment for all students and staff.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The evaluation of community cohesion initiatives and more systematic measuring of their impact  The opportunities to build stronger links between young people’s experience in secondary schools and college initiatives to promote social responsibility and community cohesion. The published survey report will list the names of the contributing institutions in an appendix. Should we wish to cite specific aspects of the good practice observed on this visit in the form of a detailed case study, we will contact you first. We will notify you of the date of publication of the survey report when it is confirmed and provide you with details of any other arrangements to disseminate the survey’s findings.

p.1

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion