Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Fletcher

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Fletcher

  • Postcode verified

    NW1 1TR

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelysecure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
278
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms T Hoenig Deputy Principal, Curriculum Working Men’s College 44 Crowndale Road London NW1 1TR

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during our recent visit. We are particularly grateful to you and all your staff for the hard work involved in preparing for the visit and for giving up your time during the visit to meet us. Please pass on our thanks to all those concerned, including your students.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

The visit provided much useful evidence for the further development of community cohesion. We noted, in particular:

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The good knowledge of local communities that ensures highly relevant courses meet the needs and aspirations of students.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The good establishment and maintenance of strategic and learning partnerships, which promote students’ learning and progression to further training, employment or community involvement.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The learner involvement and consultation arrangements that promote a sense of belonging to the college and its community. These secure improvement and participation in cultural events and raise awareness of diversity.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 An area for improvement, already identified by WMC, is training students in representation and advocacy skills, so that they can contribute more effectively as student governors and representatives.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

The published survey report will list the names of the contributing institutions in an appendix. Should we wish to cite specific aspects of the good practice observed on this visit in the form of a detailed case study, we will contact you first. We will notify you of the date of publication of the survey report when it is confirmed and provide you with details of any other arrangements to disseminate the survey’s findings. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk Yours sincerely

p.1

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion