Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David King

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David King

  • Postcode verified

    B29 5QD

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings33w0
  • What needs to improve65w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
97
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 81%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs L Harris Headteacher Weoley Castle Nursery School 121 Weoley Castle Road Weoley Castle Birmingham B29 5QD

p.1

Ofsted survey: Good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 19 March 2009 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: Good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: Good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: observations of lessons and lunchtime activities, discussions with children, staff and parents, and scrutiny of documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The school’s vision to create: ‘a safe, forward thinking, welcoming and nurturing place where emotional well-being is a high priority’, is firmly reflected in every aspect of its work in developing children’s voice.  Under the inspirational leadership of the headteacher, the highly skilled team of committed staff regularly reviews and adapts its approach to children’s voice. The impact of this rigorous approach can be seen across the whole school, where children’s skills in all areas of learning are very well developed.  At the heart of this development is the High/Scope approach and its emphasis on establishing a strong partnership between children, teachers and family. This approach is highly effective in enabling the children to be co-operative, make choices, present opinions and be reflective.  The inclusive nature of the school is very successful in ensuring that the children’s needs are clearly identified. Planning is well informed by the staff’s excellent

p.1

Features of good practice observed

knowledge of each child. This is seen to particularly good effect in the nurture group where the use of very specific profiling has enabled that group to make significant improvements with their social skills in line with their peers.  The strong emphasis on the development of literacy and oracy skills and continual focus on personalised learning, ensure that children use their well-developed skills to make their own plans, develop their independence and to explain their reasoning.  The school’s excellent partnership with parents, supported by surveys and drop-in sessions, enables children to continue to develop these skills at home. Parents say that this has resulted in their children having a very good awareness of the need to take turns, how to articulate their views clearly, how to make choices and how to plan.  The use of information communication technology offers good opportunities for the

p.1

Features of good practice observed

children to extend their learning, for example through the use of interactive whiteboards and playstation pods which support pupils in making choices and recording activities.

p.2

Area for Improvement

 To explore how High/Scope interaction strategies impact on children’s creative voice.

p.2

Area for Improvement

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in the school.

p.2

Area for Improvement

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion